I picked every Final Four winner from 1956 to 2000. I was an unstoppable handicapper and it had nothing to do with KenPom or statistics or anything other than my keen sense of observation.
I picked every Final Four winner from 1956 to 2000. I was an unstoppable handicapper and it had nothing to do with KenPom or statistics or anything other than my keen sense of observation.
I picked every Final Four winner from 1956 to 2000. I was an unstoppable handicapper and it had nothing to do with KenPom or statistics or anything other than my keen sense of observation.
teddy sevransky @teddy_covers 19h
Winner of the 'play-in' between #11 seeds Iowa and Tennessee will ABSOLUTELY be favored over #6 seed UMass in Vegas, by a couple of buckets
You lost the sports results book.
Agreed. Does kenpom generally sync up with Vegas?
This is some millenial BULLSHIT but the Harvard undergrads have a little sports analytics club (Harvard Sports Analytics Collective). They post things to their blog every now and then at www.harvardsportsanalysis.org.
Anyway, they've done an NCAA bracket model every year based on what they call Survival Analysis. Its basic premise is that postseason games are fundamentally different than regular season games, and then it does some statty stuff to account for that. Here's the big 2012 post: http://harvardsportsanalysis.wordpr...t-a-new-model-for-ncaa-tournament-prediction/
They also did one for 2013: http://harvardsportsanalysis.wordpr...-fittest-predicting-the-2013-ncaa-tournament/
Does it work? From 2012:
Favorite | Underdog | Vegas | KP | |
Florida | Albany | 21.5 | 16 | 5.5 |
Wisconsin | American | 13.5 | 8 | 5.5 |
Louisville | Manhattan | 16.5 | 12 | 4.5 |
Virgina | Coastal Carolina | 21 | 17 | 4 |
Syracuse | Western Michigan | 13 | 10 | 3 |
Michigan | Wofford | 15 | 12 | 3 |
Michigan State | Delaware | 14 | 11 | 3 |
Kentucky | Kansas St | 6 | 3 | 3 |
Vegas is probably taking into account Florida/Albany being in Orlando, while KP would theoretically just consider it a neutral court.