JDawg
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 14,843
- Reaction score
- 708
Marlins trading Buehrle, Josh Johnson and Reyes to the Blue Jays, according to Morosi. What in the world? The Marlins are non-stop entertainment.
Marlins trading Buehrle, Josh Johnson and Reyes to the Blue Jays, according to Morosi. What in the world? The Marlins are non-stop entertainment.
Giancarlo Stanton @Giancarlo818
Alright, I'm pissed off!!! Plain & Simple
Selig should step in like he did with McCourt. This can't continue
Selig should step in like he did with McCourt. This can't continue
Apparently the talks started a week or two ago. He told one of his friends that he had something in the works, but was very doubtful it would happen. Got it done, though.Random thought: Holy fucknuts would I have loved to have been a fly on the wall when AA got the call from Miami. He must have been trying so hard to hide his glee. Part of me wants to believe the Marlins were putting something like Reyes/Buehrle/Benifacio and he demanded Johnson, too, just for shits. That'd have been awesome.
Anyone know what recourse the MLBPA has to combat all these salary dumps? I remember seeing something about certain requirements for the top 10 markets to carry certain levels of payroll, or something like that. I think it was in a Ken Rosenthal article having to do with Houston's salary dump this past year.
Marlins trading Buehrle, Josh Johnson and Reyes to the Blue Jays, according to Morosi. What in the world? The Marlins are non-stop entertainment.
Unlike you guys, I don't see the trade being that great for the Blue Jays. Sure it might work for a year or two, but long-term its gonna be a dagger.
Nor do I. I was being facetious. However, I think both avalon and I figure that in the midst of all this madness, don't move your net, just in case another fish jumps.
Unlike you guys, I don't see the trade being that great for the Blue Jays. Sure it might work for a year or two, but long-term its gonna be a dagger.
I don't know anything about that requirement. However, the players are all still being paid, just by a different team. I don't see why MLBPA would have any interest in this.
No one with the commissioner’s office or players’ union is likely to object to the Astros’ cutbacks. The team is under new ownership, embarking upon a new plan. And according to the new labor agreement, the Astros — as a team playing in one of baseball’s 15 largest markets — no longer will be eligible for revenue sharing by 2014. That essentially would eliminate any say that the union might have in the matter.
Besides, the union generally does not frown upon clubs dramatically reducing their payrolls for strategic purposes, provided that those teams demonstrate a long-term intention to increase spending.