Jesus Dan! You are writing a hagiography. You know better.
There is a decent paper on this from the 2015 Sloan Sports Analytics Conference. The take home is that the chance of winning increases with earlier fouling, and that applies even more in NCAA than NBA games. The old school move is to "play good D and hope for the best," but the numbers just don't point to that being a winning strategy.
Their results show: "Using the techniques above, we can determine that for NCAA basketball, a team behind p points should foul when there are roughly t = 10.73 + 16.15 p seconds remaining." Their model uses a trip to the free throw line as an estimated 1.45 points, which I think would have been quite lower for UNC given who they had on the floor and being in the bonus. Here's the paper, if you're interested http://www.caam.rice.edu/~fhk2/basketballendgame.pdf
That's how much people loved Wellman then.
FIFY
Plenty of fans on here have had decent coaching insight and you quote a Rafi post. LOL
Maybe this latest round of expansion.
Adding basketball powerhouses Miami, VT and BC should not have hurt Wake.
And it's not like we need to be top 6 in the conference to make the tourney. .500 should suffice more often than not, with all the quality wins we can pick up
Coaching has always been the problem. Not expansion.
And when only 6 (or maybe 5?) outta 15 teams get left at home for the tourney, I'm not sure adding ND/Loui/cuse/Pitt is much of a negative. Being top 60% of our conference seems doable for Wake Forest
Maybe Miller can get a mid-major job. That's about it coming from UNCG. McCaffrey went to Siena and Dement when to SMU when they were in CUSA. If Wes succeeds at a mid-major job, he'll certainly be on Wake's radar. Is ECU ready to give up on Jeff Lebo yet?
There are several mid-major jobs better than Wake. He will definitely be on our radar. But like Tyler Hansbrough, Steph Curry and so many more examples, when he enters the slow moving WF radar, he'll be gone.