Deacfreak07
Ain't played nobody, PAWL!
It is amazing to me the number of posters who think coaches make decisions to avoid challenges and increased competition.
I want Shaka but I see no plausible way that we get him. If you're him, you are winning now and show no signs that you will stop winning any time soon. He can build an empire at VCU. If he comes here, he will likely become forgotten as he rebuilds for 2-3 years with the hopes of making it back to the tournament every year. However, the pressure here is higher than VCU given that our fanbase has had considerable success and we are surrounded by the elite. Again, I'd go Roy McAvoy after he dunked in his 12th shot if we got him, but I fear that our hopes of getting him are nearly that long.
The more likely hire, IMO, remains Howland. The Marquette job being open sucks but we have the money, the tradition and the not-Milwaukee-weather to win him over.
If you are a good coach, how do you not win at Michigan???
I want Shaka but I see no plausible way that we get him. If you're him, you are winning now and show no signs that you will stop winning any time soon. He can build an empire at VCU. If he comes here, he will likely become forgotten as he rebuilds for 2-3 years with the hopes of making it back to the tournament every year. However, the pressure here is higher than VCU given that our fanbase has had considerable success and we are surrounded by the elite. Again, I'd go Roy McAvoy after he dunked in his 12th shot if we got him, but I fear that our hopes of getting him are nearly that long.
The more likely hire, IMO, remains Howland. The Marquette job being open sucks but we have the money, the tradition and the not-Milwaukee-weather to win him over.
1. Shaka - least likely though
2. Howland - safe bet if he's willing to wait for us
3. Miller - like the "little brother" thing.....could be a "keeper" for a long while
It is amazing to me the number of posters who think coaches make decisions to avoid challenges and increased competition.
This is my list.
My top three changed:
1. SHAKA
2. SHAKA
3. SHAKA
Thinking any other way shows weakness and the acceptance of failure.
I like it. But since there's zero chance Shaka will actually come here and Howland is going to Marquette here's my realistic top three:My top three changed:
1. SHAKA
2. SHAKA
3. SHAKA
Thinking any other way shows weakness and the acceptance of failure.
I like it. But since there's zero chance Shaka will actually come here he's my realistic top three:
1. Russell Turner (dude can straight up coach)
2. Mike Lonergan (intense and fiery competitor who just flat out wins)
3. Brett Reed (has proven he can compete at this level with real student athletes)
Make it happen Ron!
I like it. But since there's zero chance Shaka will actually come here and Howland is going to Marquette here's my realistic top three:
Make it happen Ron!
I doubt you could have found a single person in the basketball world (other than buzz's people and VT) who would have thought Buzz Williams would be at VT today.
Screw it, you're right.
1.DYLAN
2.DYLAN
3.DYLAN
4.DYLAN
5.DYLAN
6.SHAKA
Accept no less!
Not getting SHaka. Have you looked at his last 2 recruiting classes......4 four stars......why leave?
It is amazing to me the number of posters who think coaches make decisions to avoid challenges and increased competition.