WakeandBake
Well-known member
If this is intended to be a synopisis of my position outlined in my posts, this would be a textbook example of the ad hominem, deliberate mischaracterizations I was referring to earlier in my post to W&B.
Promoting sustainable, efficient solutions funded by stake-holding consumers as an alternative to another albatross, unsustainable entitlement program administered by an unaccountable bureaucracy on a collision course with insolvency---isn't "anti-healthcare." It's perhaps the most "pro-health care" position one could have, if you desire a health care system we can actually sustain. What I'm "anti'-" is the insincere fable that the entitlement-fairy will just provide for all of us, happily ever after.
I won't even address the insinuation that anyone could have "no problem sending young men and women into harms way....[costs]....irrelevant." If you want to claim a baseless, ad hominem, exhausted refrain as a serious argument, then I can't debate with you.
how was my post an ad hominem attack? I attacked your vision and position, not you personally.