• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Millennials...

yeah but those compounds can vary in the same strain.

The strains are grown to maximize those compounds, as well as odor, tightness off buds, etc. That there is some science to managing the "high" is bullshit.

Anecdotally, I have smoked out of the same bag and one day it layed me out. The other day it lifted me up. It has as much to do with the user and other variables.

This is bullshit that dealers and dispensaries are telling you donks.

I dont even buy into this shit, I just googled it for five minutes.

This is what Im talking about, you guys are fucking dorks about everything. Just live your life and learn shit on your own and quit buying into every trendy thing and idea thrown your way on the internet. I'd love to be your weed dealers

lol wut

it's honestly not even remotely complicated to breed a sativa, indica, or blend without worrying about cross-pollination, especially if you're doing it indoors

i'm glad your 5 minute google research vindicated your lifetime of smoking pot and not recognizing any differences from one bag to the next (though i find it unbelievable that you don't think it's changed since you were younger when that's clearly the case

i'd love to sell to you too, you don't seem to give a shit about the product
 
the irony in all this is that i pay way less for way better quality bud than w&b.
 
conversation seemingly always goes this way with non-millennials

NM: disparaging remark about millennials
M: wut?
NM: lol you're butthurt
 
what do you disagree with? is it that these are 2 different compounds, that they have different effects, or that different strains have different amounts of each?

Im saying that I have gotten high for almost 30 years off of every different kind of weed you can think of. I feel the same "high" every time. Sometimes I am tired and sometimes I am not, and my "high" may reflect this.

I am saying that when some asshole tells you this weed makes you able to do math, but not English - he is full of shit. When someone tells you his weed will make you de-stress better than the guy's down the street, I am saying he is just trying to sell you weed. Sometimes that sack will destress you, sometimes it will make you anxious. Its you, not the weed.
 
lol wut

it's honestly not even remotely complicated to breed a sativa, indica, or blend without worrying about cross-pollination, especially if you're doing it indoors

i'm glad your 5 minute google research vindicated your lifetime of smoking pot and not recognizing any differences from one bag to the next (though i find it unbelievable that you don't think it's changed since you were younger when that's clearly the case

i'd love to sell to you too, you don't seem to give a shit about the product

LOL the only thing that has changed is that it is stronger now. I was there when it happened, hoss. I didnt read about it on the interwebs.

I love it, look at Townie all caring about the product more than me. LOL sucker
 
Last edited:
Im saying that I have gotten high for almost 30 years off of every different kind of weed you can think of. I feel the same "high" every time. Sometimes I am tired and sometimes I am not, and my "high" may reflect this.

I am saying that when some asshole tells you this weed makes you able to do math, but not English - he is full of shit. When someone tells you his weed will make you de-stress better than the guy's down the street, I am saying he is just trying to sell you weed. Sometimes that sack will destress you, sometimes it will make you anxious. Its you, not the weed.

but that's not what science, or my experience, tells me. even the article you linked recognizes different highs, but it points out that the branding misses the boat. no fucking duh. is the difference overblown? of course. but to pretend like there's no difference between strains is idiotic.

the guy i buy from gives a variety pack, so i'm not too worried about the brands. it's always 4 high quality strains for better prices than i paid for beasters at wake. by a lot.
 
LOL the only thing that has changed is that it is stronger now. I was there when it happened, hoss. I didnt read about it on the interwebs

i'd say the evolution of quality happened in our smoketime as well (last 18 years). when i first started it was all seedy regs, and we slowly started to see "crips" or "hydro" that meant good indoor. that has since gotten even more specialized and strength has continued to get better and better.
 
but that's not what science, or my experience, tells me. even the article you linked recognizes different highs, but it points out that the branding misses the boat. no fucking duh. is the difference overblown? of course. but to pretend like there's no difference between strains is idiotic.

the guy i buy from gives a variety pack, so i'm not too worried about the brands. it's always 4 high quality strains for better prices than i paid for beasters at wake. by a lot.

Its placebo, yo. The guy tells you one is more mellow. Or you smoke some out of bag A one day and feel mellow. So you think, "this one makes me mellow." And so on.

The science is infantile. Hoe these compounds effect people varies from person to person. One plant from the crop could have different levels than the other. And so on and so on.


End result is its all basically the fucking same, some are just stronger than others.
 
dude, you can't just be like "no, it's not because i think the idea of different things being different is a ridiculous millennial thing" and think that's a real argument
 
Its placebo, yo. The guy tells you one is more mellow. Or you smoke some out of bag A one day and feel mellow. So you think, "this one makes me mellow." And so on.

The science is infantile. Hoe these compounds effect people varies from person to person. One plant from the crop could have different levels than the other. And so on and so on.

yes, but prior to the branding, i'd smoke some that felt more up and some that felt more down. obviously, that varies based on all the things youve mentioned, but generally speaking it holds. i'd also bet that for the majority of all pot you've smoked it's hybrids anyway and the same bag may have come from different plants. also, growing from seed vs. clone also allows for huge variation from the same stock as 99.9% of all plants today are some hybridization.
 
really? because so far your argument to phan and townie is "your info is fucking dumb b/c i've had the same high for 30 years. you're being fooled by marketing lol"
 
this is comical. I posted a fucking link so you dorks would have some "science." then I referenced my experiences as "anecdotal." What more do you want?
 
Its placebo, yo. The guy tells you one is more mellow. Or you smoke some out of bag A one day and feel mellow. So you think, "this one makes me mellow." And so on.

The science is infantile. Hoe these compounds effect people varies from person to person. One plant from the crop could have different levels than the other. And so on and so on.


End result is its all basically the fucking same, some are just stronger than others.

Which is exactly the same as the craft beer argument. The motto of the millenial generation should be: going through life getting duped by the internet.
 
this is comical. I posted a fucking link so you dorks would have some "science." then I referenced my experiences as "anecdotal." What more do you want?

did you read the study? the study you referenced essentially stated that head shops in LA had no consistency built around the brands. nu fucking duh. i don't think anyone would argue with that.
 
Its placebo, yo. The science is infantile.

I kind of want KickballDeac, who is working on his PhD in cannabinoid research, to come on this thread and just start throwing haymakers, but I get the sense you'd just call it millennial bullshit.

There's a reason they use cannabidiol for medical reasons and not THC, and it's because of their very different chemical properties affecting the neurotransmitters of the brain very differently.

And as earlier stated, it's not challenging whatsoever to effectively grow a plant with more of one cannabinoid than another.
 
Which is exactly the same as the craft beer argument. The motto of the millenial generation should be: going through life getting duped by the internet.

what's the placebo effect with craft beer? the non-marketed beer that "the internet" tells us to like better appeals to our taste buds because some bearded hipster liked it instead of a talking frog on television?
 
Fortunately for WB or 2&2 they can just be like haha we trolled you y'all are so dumb if they ever get the sense that they're actually wrong or making terrible arguments.
 
yes, but prior to the branding, i'd smoke some that felt more up and some that felt more down. obviously, that varies based on all the things youve mentioned, but generally speaking it holds. i'd also bet that for the majority of all pot you've smoked it's hybrids anyway and the same bag may have come from different plants. also, growing from seed vs. clone also allows for huge variation from the same stock as 99.9% of all plants today are some hybridization.

Have you ever bought one single bag of kind bud, pulled a piece off a nice bud and smoked 2 hits some on a Monday night and felt very mellow and introspective - and then on Wed afternoon smoked 2 hits off the same bud and felt energetic and imaginative? Because I have. Were the two weed samples different, or were the circumstances?

For Mr Captain, that is a pretty good test. Same bud, same guy, same dosage - different result.


Now, can two different buds have varying amounts of the chemicals that influence the brain's receptors and produce a different "high?" One that was more suited for relaxation or stimulation? I don't buy it, and the science has yet to prove it as I can see.
 
Back
Top