Ya thanks birdman for the clarification. I certainly want as many good BB recruits as we can get. Beggars (or shitty teams) can't be choosers, so to speak. I mean, yes, we should be selective (sorry Rondale), but you want as much great talent as you can get. My over-arching point is that, assuming Murray isn't a realistic target, should we really take Ellison for fear of losing out on Kwe Parker? I'm more or less wondering out loud if having 4 guards essentially (including Hudson) committed for 2016 and beyond already will hurt our chances with targets like Ellison & Murray and perhaps Parker down the road.
Many think that getting Chill & Parker will really enhance our chances with Giles, but I'm not so sure. I think Giles is gonna do simply what he wants regardless of how many close friends wind up at a certain school. But if we have a legit shot with Murray (I'm not sure we do), then I think I'd be willing to sacrifice Parker and Ellison knowing we'll have Crawford, Murray, Chill, Mitchell and Hudson to round out the minute distribution at the 1, 2 & 3. Of course if Giles comes to Wake, then he's your 3 for 38 mins per game and Hudson and Mitchell are battling for P/T IMO.
As we know, Danny will play the guys who give him the best chance to win regardless of class or experience. However, on the plus side, Danny seems to want depth and a healthy rotation of 8-10 guys if he can get it.