• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Planned Parenthood Attack

According to the lawyer representing Planned Parenthood, Daleiden sent an email offering to buy fetal tissue for $1,600 per sample, which led to the charge of attempting to buy organs. That seems........ really dumb.

It's dumb because they're dumb just like Wrangor and others are being dumb and keep lying to themselves about this issue.

They thought PP was straight up selling organs which is illegal so they offered to straight up buy organs which is illegal.
 
Last edited:
Something can be 'human' (adjective) without being 'a human' (noun).

This is great. You sound like Bill Clinton defining the word 'is'. I think it is poor logic.

Also there's no doubt that the right-wing media will hook onto the misdemeanor charge similar in a way that Wrangor has while omitting the felony charge of falsifying documents. I'm not saying that was intentional on Wrangor's part, but this will be a seminar in obfuscating the actual relevant legal issue at play in this specific case from the right.

Unintentional. Should have made it more clear. I fully understand why they are going to be charged with falsifying documents, and think they should and will be convicted. They did the crime, and in the end I am assuming they felt the punishment was worth the risk of disobeying the civil laws in order to bring light to the injustice.

Wrangor can accept continuing to lie about that for the right cause.

The abortion debate has been had on this board. The self righteousness from PH is great. As if he wouldn't do the exact same thing if the injustice was large enough in his mind. Perhaps missionaries to India and Afghanistan should turn themselves in to the government upon their arrival to the country to minister to the poor and share the Gospel. It is a laughable proposition that anyone with any sort of moral compass wouldn't subversively push back against severe injustice if they felt that was the best method to combat it.

Not going to get sucked into the debate about abortion, but wanted to comment on those remarks. ETA - I might get sucked in because of the condescension of certain posters regarding any opinion that is not their own.
 
Last edited:
Very close friends are moderate 'Pubs who are deeply religious. One of their kids is a newlywed pregnant with her first child. She has a sibling who's a med school prof at a top ten school specializing in high risk pregnancies. There were complications with the pregnancy and there hadn't been a heartbeat for six weeks. Technically the daughter had a late term abortion, but the thought process was she would miscarry eventually, the baby was already dead, so why not deal with the inevitable on their own timetable? Everyone involved was on the same page, but the GOP platform would have banned the procedure.

If the baby is dead how is that an abortion?
 
That PP is selling baby parts.

Haha....too great. Human parts are not baby parts. I have heard it all now. The Selling/recouping expenses differentiation is inconsequential to my view on the topic.
 
Haha....too great. Human parts are not baby parts. I have heard it all now. The Selling/recouping expenses differentiation is inconsequential to my view on the topic.

i posted too soon.
 
Haha....too great. Human parts are not baby parts. I have heard it all now. The Selling/recouping expenses differentiation is inconsequential to my view on the topic.

Who said human parts aren't baby parts? Stop lying.

The difference between profiting from selling baby parts and donating baby parts for science is pretty huge. You're staying willfully ignorant on this.
 
i posted too soon.

The irony is too thick. I am the one lying to myself and you are the one that is convinced that human parts that come from a baby aren't baby parts.

This is why this discussion is pointless. Good day. We will never see eye to eye on this. I believe history will side with the pro-life argument. Hopefully we can elect a Republican president who will nominate a few judges that will overturn Roe v. Wade. That is the only way this will change anyway, so it is somewhat useless arguing about it. Nobody really changes their opinion on abortion based on an internet conversation.
 
The irony is too thick. I am the one lying to myself and you are the one that is convinced that human parts that come from a baby aren't baby parts.

This is why this discussion is pointless. Good day. We will never see eye to eye on this. I believe history will side with the pro-life argument. Hopefully we can elect a Republican president who will nominate a few judges that will overturn Roe v. Wade. That is the only way this will change anyway, so it is somewhat useless arguing about it. Nobody really changes their opinion on abortion based on an internet conversation.

If you really believe abortion is murder you would be doing more than saying "hopefully we can elect a Republican president who will nominate a few judges that will overturn Roe v. Wade." Like moving to Ireland or Chile.
 
Who said human parts aren't baby parts? Stop lying.

The difference between profiting from selling baby parts and donating baby parts for science is pretty huge. You're staying willfully ignorant on this.

Yes it is me that is ignorant. You are the one that is condemning dishonesty in support of your moral compass.

Wouldn't have pegged you as a guy that was anti-underground railroad. OR perhaps Anne Frank should have reported her activities honestly to the Germans in order to be moral.

#HarrietTubmanOut
 
still waiting to hear Wrangor's solution for the abortions that will happen anyway once he finally prooves the justice of our culture and ends legal abortion
 
If you really believe abortion is murder you would be doing more than saying "hopefully we can elect a Republican president who will nominate a few judges that will overturn Roe v. Wade."

What would you suggest I do? What would be most effective?
 
What would you suggest I do? What would be most effective?

Lying, cheating, leaving the country. Putting murderers to death. Whatever it took to stop the millions of government sanctioned murders and murderers.
 
still waiting to hear Wrangor's solution for the abortions that will happen anyway once he finally prooves the justice of our culture and ends legal abortion

Solutions for what? Treat it as a crime, which is what the rest of our law portfolio states when you without permission end the life of another innocent human. You don't condone killing because it is difficult to enforce the law. That is ridiculous.
 
The irony is too thick. I am the one lying to myself and you are the one that is convinced that human parts that come from a baby aren't baby parts.

This is why this discussion is pointless. Good day. We will never see eye to eye on this. I believe history will side with the pro-life argument. Hopefully we can elect a Republican president who will nominate a few judges that will overturn Roe v. Wade. That is the only way this will change anyway, so it is somewhat useless arguing about it. Nobody really changes their opinion on abortion based on an internet conversation.

the only thing i corrected you on is that recovering costs is not the same as making profits. don't you run a farm? is recovering your costs the same as making a profit?

stop being a dumbass
 
If the baby is dead how is that an abortion?

There was a medical definition that I didn't follow from the med school prof sibling that the procedure wouldn't be allowed if laws were changed. Seemed bizarre that some are so wrapped up in ideology that they would favor a miscarriage that could happen at any time over a scheduled procedure. Perspective grandparents were focused on their daughter's psyche, but bitter about unnecessary ideological purity.
 
Solutions for what? Treat it as a crime, which is what the rest of our law portfolio states when you without permission end the life of another innocent human. You don't condone killing because it is difficult to enforce the law. That is ridiculous.

so this has nothing to do with actually limiting abortions, then. got it
 
Lying, cheating, leaving the country. Putting murderers to death. Whatever it took to stop the millions of government sanctioned murders and murderers.

Where would I go? How would that change anything in America? You are learning from the master PH. Set up a false equivalency and then pounce when the person you are discussion the issue with inevitably can't meet the quota. Congrats. You got me. I really DON'T think abortion is murder and I am just having a lot of fun defending my fake position from 6-7 other people who are calling me dumb, ignorant, etc... Brilliant deduction Sherlock.
 
Back
Top