myDeaconmyhand
First man to get a team of horses up Bear Mountain
Good on the Texas legislature for their concern for the well-being of abortion providers. How thoughtful of them!
You mean to determine if a law has a legally well-reasoned basis, right? Because the law doesn't have the market on reason cornered.
Again, no one is requiring the mother to perform a burial, attend a funeral service, or, for that matter, do a single thing different than before this law was passed. This law keeps abortion providers from pureeing fetuses in a cuisinart.
(B)The products of spontaneous or induced human abortion shall be subjected to one of the following methods of treatment and disposal:
(i)fetal tissue, regardless of the period of gestation, except as provided by §1.133 of this title (relating to Scope, Covering Exemptions and Minimum Parametric Standards for Waste Treatment Technologies Previously Approved by the Texas Department of State Health Services):
(I)incineration followed by interment;
(II)steam disinfection followed by interment; or
(III)interment;
(ii)blood and body fluids:
(I)discharging into a sanitary sewer system;
(II)steam disinfection followed by deposition in a sanitary landfill;
(III)incineration followed by deposition of the residue in a sanitary landfill;
(IV)thermal inactivation followed by deposition in a sanitary landfill;
(V)thermal inactivation followed by grinding and discharging into a sanitary sewer system;
(VI)chemical disinfection followed by deposition in a sanitary landfill;
(VII)chemical disinfection followed by grinding and discharging into a sanitary sewer system;
(VIII)moist heat disinfection followed by deposition in a sanitary landfill;
(IX)chlorine disinfection/maceration followed by deposition in a sanitary landfill; or
(X)an approved alternate treatment process, provided that the process renders the item as unrecognizable, followed by deposition in a sanitary landfill;
(iii)any other tissues, including placenta, umbilical cord and gestational sac:
(I)grinding and discharging to a sanitary sewer system;
(II)incineration followed by deposition of the residue in a sanitary landfill;
(III)steam disinfection followed by interment;
(IV)interment;
(V)moist heat disinfection followed by deposition in a sanitary landfill;
(VI)chlorine disinfection/maceration followed by deposition in a sanitary landfill; or
(VII)an approved alternate treatment process, provided that the process renders the item as unrecognizable, followed by deposition in a sanitary landfill.
I have no idea. I don't think it matters even a little bit, though.
TRIGGER WARNING
Hypothetically speaking, what if the legislature concluded that putting a third trimester aborted fetus in a blender, hitting puree, and then flushing it down the toilet creates unwanted psychological effects on abortion providers, nurses, and the general public that causes the denigration and devaluation of human life in the mind of the general populace? Why is that conclusion, which pertains to psychological well being, qualitatively different from a conclusion that dead bodies lining the street create an undue risk of physical disease?
It's almost like you intentionally ignored the phrase "general public."
Also, I sincerely doubt you'd make an argument like "stupid roofers don't need safety ladders. Just get a new job!"
I have no idea. I don't think it matters even a little bit, though.
Obamacare and prochoice policies help reduce abortion rate to pre-Roe levels; lowest in 45 years
More carrot, less stick plz.
Obamacare and prochoice policies help reduce abortion rate to pre-Roe levels; lowest in 45 years
More carrot, less stick plz.
What's an unplanned abortion?