• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Should there be consequences for PACs that don't stand up for free speech?

Milo has resigned from Breitbart. Wonder when Republicans are going to ask their Republican President, Republican Donald Trump, a Republican who was accused of sexual assault by a 13 year old girl and a Republican who liked to hang out in Miss Teen USA dressing rooms, to resign as their Republican President.
 
A policy would be an issues-based alternative to the ACA, or sensible immigration reforms. Or responding to the unmet needs of that game-changing demographic that gave rise Trump in the first place. That's what I am hoping for.

Ok, great, I'm looking forward to "traditional Republicans" putting forward these policies. Right now, "non-traditional" Republicans -- but Republicans nonetheless -- are failing to repeal/replace and banning Muslims.
 
Please don't fall for the transparent McCain shtick. That "Maverick" votes with the Republican's 96% of the time.

I'm very capable of seeing through his posturing, thank you.

Doesn't mean that Democrats don't still need some Republicans to stand up against Trump, even if it is mostly bullshit.
 
Milo has resigned from Breitbart. Wonder when Republicans are going to ask their Republican President, Republican Donald Trump, a Republican who was accused of sexual assault by a 13 year old girl and a Republican who liked to hang out in Miss Teen USA dressing rooms, to resign as their Republican President.

I've seen that apparently pedophilia may be the line for some conservative's. Let's see how this plays out.
 
I've seen that apparently gay pedophilia may be the line for some conservative's. Let's see how this plays out.

Important addendum. We haven't seen them stand up against straight pederasts yet.
 
Important addendum. We haven't seen them stand up against straight pederasts yet.

well the "won't somebody please think of the children!" responses from HB2 defenders have usually centered on protecting little girls, and ignoring how this would do nothing to stop the Sanduskies of the world.
 
Important addendum. We haven't seen them stand up against straight pederasts yet.

Are there such things as "straight pederasts"? I don't think there are. Pederasty is an inherently homosexual institution.
 
Or more correctly, a man-boy institution. I guess you could be straight and into abusing little boys, but I'm not sure that's what you meant.

Either way, Republican hypocrisy noted.
 
Can we officially ban Lena Dunham from politics too now
 
Are there such things as "straight pederasts"? I don't think there are. Pederasty is an inherently homosexual institution.

This is not so.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/9/18/903178/-

"Sexual violence and abuse is about power, domination, and control. It's not about sexual attraction."

" The answer is no. Because , for one, sexual orientation isn't about behavior alone. For example, when Governor Jim McGreevy feigned heterosexuality most of his life and formed a heterosexual family, and presumably engaged in heterosexual behavior was he a heterosexual all of that time? Or was he simply a closeted gay man? Behavior isn't always consistent with sexual orientation and attraction."

" Margaret Smith reported back to the Bishops on early findings from their study. From the USA Today:

We do not find a connection between homosexual identity and the increased likelihood of subsequent abuse from the data that we have right now ... It's important to separate the sexual identity and the behavior. Someone can commit sexual acts that might be of a homosexual nature but not have a homosexual identity."

"Perhaps this is why Pope Benedict XVI himself, en route to the United States for his visit in 2008, responded this way to a question about the abuse crisis: "I do not wish to talk about homosexuality, but about pedophilia, which is a different thing." ~ Rev James Martin, SJ, It's Not About Homosexuality: Blaming the Wrong People for the Sexual Abuse Crisis, Huffington Post"
 
Thanks. I thought it was just a term for pedophile, not specifically a man who has sex with boys. I clearly don't know as much about this as wakephan.
 
Any thread discussing pederasty wouldn't be complete without a shout-out to Hanrahan.

Sent from my SM-S903VL using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Which of course has nothing to do with the fact that the current head of the Republican party is president Donald Trump. Embrace the L.

Sent from my SM-S903VL using Tapatalk

As noted, it actually isn't. Everything about your post checks out, except the facts. Business as usual.
 
As noted, it actually isn't. Everything about your post checks out, except the facts. Business as usual.

Not really. You just created the idea that the head of the of the national committee is the head of the party. Any astute political commentator would laugh you out of the room if you suggested that, but you apparently enjoy being a clown over taking the L in this regard.
 
As noted, it actually isn't. Everything about your post checks out, except the facts. Business as usual.

Not really. You just created the idea that the head of the of the national committee is the head of the party. Any astute political commentator would laugh you out of the room if you suggested that, but you apparently enjoy being a clown over taking the L in this regard.

simone-biles-1-800.jpg
 
Not really. You just created the idea that the head of the of the national committee is the head of the party. Any astute political commentator would laugh you out of the room if you suggested that, but you apparently enjoy being a clown over taking the L in this regard.

The head of the party is...the head of the party. This eludes you?
 
Back
Top