DistrictDeacon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2011
- Messages
- 13,054
- Reaction score
- 1,068
WH doubling down. Shocker.
So the one part of Kelly's spiel that we can actually independently verify isn't even close to accurate, but for the rest we should obviously believe him and not the cowboy hat bling wearing uppity congresswomen from Florida?
Oh for god’s sake
If they won't believe an audio tape (or a video tape, in the case of Chris), what's the point? We've entered the post-evidence phase of the Syndrome. Sure, you might have video tape, but do you have the subjective impressions of a glam rock lookalike contest loser who confirms your biases?
JHMD. Won’t. Care.
So you are saying a videotape can confirm whether someone is lying? Interesting.
So now we are attacking a Gold Star general?
Aeswome
He's not telling them what they want to hear. He must be lying.
Only if it is directly unrelated to the issue at hand and is interpreted with JHMD's politically biased conjecture. If it is direct evidence that somebody JHMD supports, then it will be ignored and responded to with some snarky response.
Sure you can. Just clarify your priorities. If you value your investments which are doing great, just say that. If you value your conservative agenda being advanced at all costs, just say that.
So now we are attacking a Gold Star general?
Awesome
Even if for argument's sake they spun the story, it still pales in comparison to what the adminstration before them lied about and what this adminstration has lied about.
As for the direct evidence that Kelly wasn't telling the truth, probably ignoring it is your best bet here.
Whataboutism, then?
Whataboutism, then?