dartsndeacs
THE quintessential dwarf
Palma is enthusiastically on his hands and knees face buried deep ready for those oats.
DonaldRoss was right, none of y'all can ever envision running a business, let alone 15.
Palma is enthusiastically on his hands and knees face buried deep ready for those oats.
DonaldRoss was right, none of y'all can ever envision running a business, let alone 15.
DonaldRoss was right, none of y'all can ever envision running a business, let alone 15.
who runs 15 businesses?
who runs 15 businesses?
To comply with the terms of the Byrd Rule that allows Senate Republicans to bypass a Democratic filibuster, the tax plan must meet two conditions. On the one hand, it needs to comply with the budget resolution’s mandate to raise the deficit by no more than $1.5 trillion over 10 years. According to Penn-Wharton, it does that. But on the other hand, it needs to not increase the long-term deficit in the years following.
And here’s where Penn-Wharton says that there’s a problem: “We estimate that the Senate TCJA continues to reduce revenue in years beyond the 10-year budget window.”
Critically, this conclusion does not change when they attempt a “dynamic” score that considers the potential growth-boosting effects of tax cuts. Instead, they find that “the Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduces federal tax revenue in both the short- and long-run relative to current policy. In the near term, there is a small boost to GDP, but that increase diminishes over time.”
Are they doing anything with deductions for college tuition costs?
Never mind, I just looked it up.
Sigh.
Yes, by all means let’s transfer more money to our colleges.
?
Pretty sure that in multiple ways these proposals are going to raise the costs of attending college and of financing that cost (for those needing to finance it).
Seems swell.