Louis Gossett Jr
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
- Messages
- 12,907
- Reaction score
- 6,810
Smooth lady boys being compared to the masculine superior white men of America, now I’ve seen everything.
I mean, there are school shootings in South Korea and Japan all the time, right?
You don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about. In the last Senate election here I voted for Michelle Nunn. I live in the GA congressional that held a run off last year. I voted for the Dem, John Ossoff. I voted for Hillary, whom I despise, because of Trump.
Republicans have done nothing about gun control. There’s the answer to your question.
Let me go back to my question that you won’t answer. You didn’t say politicians only care about themselves. You said Republicans don’t care about children who die in shootings. So do you think that an entire group of people, identifiable by their political affiliation, don’t care about the children who are killed in these mass killings?
Please answer the question.
i remember after finishing "No Russian" for the 400th time i was full prepped to mow down a terminal full of lame civvies with a SAW lolpwn3d
Dillon Fence is just saying don't distort the statistics, not that we should ignore the ones that accurately show that we need gun control.
Exactly. Giving absurd statistics only serves to muddy the waters and distract from the real issue - it weakens the case for sensible gun control instead of strengthening it.
Yet the only people weakening the case for sensible gun control are the ones poking holes in the statistics.
The point is, if you are trying to make the case that there are way too many school shootings (which is clearly a true point), why include things in the numbers which clearly are not "school shootings". All it does is give folks who desire to detract from the main issue the chance to do just that by poking those holes. If you use accurate and relevant statistics they don't have that opportunity.
And, when it is pointed out that the statistics you are using are not correct, it hurts the credibility of everything else you are saying.
when a gun is shot at a school, it is a school shooting. don't be obtuse.
The point is, if you are trying to make the case that there are way too many school shootings (which is clearly a true point), why include things in the numbers which clearly are not "school shootings". All it does is give folks who desire to detract from the main issue the chance to do just that by poking those holes. If you use accurate and relevant statistics they don't have that opportunity.
And, when it is pointed out that the statistics you are using are not correct, it hurts the credibility of everything else you are saying.
And this is what we're working with, el oh el
what's the deal with school shootings anyway? the school building's not doing the shooting nor is it someone going in to shoot the building.
Uh....
• A shot from off campus struck a building at California State University, San Bernardino at around 6 p.m
it's literally the action that happened. my god.