Deacon923
Scooter Banks
solution for officer fear = extra-judicial killing.
what is the correct police officer response at this juncture:
if a trained cop can't take down an unarmed naked guy, why are we paying him/her
First, the cop may be trying to save his ass. His take isn’t reliable unless non-cops corroborate it at best.
So far, the eyewitness accounts we’ve heard have been consistent: our officer tried using verbal commands, then used non-lethal force first by deploying his Taser before using his service weapon
Second, why is a dead hit and run suspect a better outcome than a live hit and run suspect? I really don’t understand that.
who is saying otherwise? I don't understand how you could draw the conclusion that anyone thinks this is the case
solution for officer fear = extra-judicial killing.
Lesson to criminals (and everyone else): Don't charge cops.
obviously we don't have complete data at this point; however from the article you linked:
who is saying otherwise? I don't understand how you could draw the conclusion that anyone thinks this is the case
Maybe his penis was a weapon of mass destruction
You are explaining why a dead suspect is better than a live suspect. The idea that there’s nothing else he could have done is exactly that.
what's your argument again? that the best course of action for a police officer in the US is to kill an unarmed naked person?
I'll take that as a yes from you
i don't think his behavior is relevant
It's not "Protect & Serve" it's "Comply or Die", and for some minorities its comply AND die. Cops are legally allowed to kill leashed dogs for barking, what else do you need to know?Lesson to criminals (and everyone else): Don't charge cops.
no
the best course of action is to talk to the suspect
then to use non-lethal force
there seem to be witnesses stating that this is what the officer did
are you, Ph, and 923 suggesting that the best course of action upon being confronted by a police officer is to charge directly towards him?