1) It actually averages to 5.97073 if you fail to take into account the moon.
2) You failed to take into account the moon phases on the days that the games were played.
3) The entire point of my post is to make fun of your "how many points better" argument as if you can measure the affects of a different coach by simply adding a few points to the results of each game and assessing where that would land us in Kenpom. But then, you're smarter than that, I think. Maybe not. Or maybe you're just trying to start an argument.
4) If we're going to argue, please redo your analysis based the low end of my given range representing a new moon and the high end representing a full moon. You can assume that the points step evenly up and down by day throughout the phases. Only then can you see how much of a difference a better coach would have made on any given day. We could get a little more technical and apply a correction factor for the difference in height of a new coach compared to Manning, but it's extremely minimal and I don't think we need to go that far.