They have also lost to bad teams. Why don't you talk about them being under .333 in their conference?
Here are a couple of real world decisions- If Jaylen Hoard was 4-4 on threes and Brandon was 0-5, if I had one shot left, there would be no hesitation in giving it to Hoard. Or if Barrett was 5-5 and Reddish was 0-5, RJ gets the last shot.
Games aren't played by computers. They are played by human beings. If you haven't made a shot (and aren't a superstar), you will most likely have less confidence in your next shot than the guy who hasn't missed.
Today is the day! I’m so ducking excited I can’t sleep. WE ARE!
BIG TEN SECOND ROUND.
#10 Penn State Nittany Lions (14-17, 7-13) vs. #7 tournament-bound Minnesota Golden Gophers (9-11, 19-12).
United Center.
Chicago, Illinois.
6:00 PM CT.
Big Ten Network.
Penn State (-2.5).
Per KenPom's log5 analysis, Penn State has a 1.1% chance of hoisting the coveted Big 10 trophy this weekend. Do you believe in miracles? YESSS!!!!
I thought about snatching up tickets for tonight's game and flying out but have work conflicts.
Thanks for proving my point. My initial post INCLUDED Penn State's 8-15 record not just the loss to Rutgers.
BTW, they are LAST place in their conference. They have TWO conference wins. It's ABSURD than any ranking would have a team that 2-11 in their own conference to be #58 in the nation.
I'm not talking about anyone other than Penn State.
It's one thing if they were 5-8 or 4-9 in their conference, but they aren't. They are 2-11 and in LAST place. They have also lost to three out of the other four worst teams in the Big We Can't Count conference. They have also lost to bad teams like DePaul and Bradley.
Sorry, there is no rational way to make this shitshow be ranked #58.
Then it should be showing that they will continue losing. If it's truly predictive, that's what it should do.