deacdiggler
"Well known member"
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2011
- Messages
- 24,047
- Reaction score
- 12,180
i really tried to be rational and reasonable, but i get that he doesn't see it that way. I'm not going to argue with him anymore about it.
what would it take to remove rj from the boards?
all these protests have me feeling like an activist and I want to bring some of that energy here
I will acknowledge that it's not unreasonable for rj to think i have it out for him, considering that i did once harmlessly hack his account. (Although i left no offensive reps for anyone - I think i posrepped milhouse and biff, etc). So I shouldn't expect him to receive anything I say positively, regardless of my intent or tone. oh well.
i wouldn't vote to change anything. he provides plenty of discussion, which is the point.
For me that's not really the point if the discussion is obviously not useful and clearly violates board standards, and leads to additional non-useful discussions and further violations of board standards. The reason people react to RJ posts they way that they do is that RJ is a toxic piece of shit.
Also what he said to S33 was straight up awful shit.
I know words are difficult for him but deconstruct. "Strickland is the kind of Jew who creates Nazis"
While correct Strickland is the subject he is being defined as a Jew, and what kind of Jew is he, he is the kind of Jew that creates Nazis. So in his sentence there are types of Jews that create Nazis, this isn't contained to just Strickland because its a type. So in this scenario there wouldn't be Nazis unless they were created by Jewish people like Strickland, sounds pretty anti-semitic to me
i really tried to be rational and reasonable, but i get that he doesn't see it that way. I'm not going to argue with him anymore about it.
then fuckin do something about it
why even have a people's mod if he's gonna be such a LIMPDICK
wait what
Also what he said to S33 was straight up awful shit.
I know words are difficult for him but deconstruct. "Strickland is the kind of Jew who creates Nazis"
While correct Strickland is the subject he is being defined as a Jew, and what kind of Jew is he, he is the kind of Jew that creates Nazis. So in his sentence there are types of Jews that create Nazis, this isn't contained to just Strickland because its a type. So in this scenario there wouldn't be Nazis unless they were created by Jewish people like Strickland, sounds pretty anti-semitic to me
but isn't this like black people using the N-word? we know rj isn't anti-semitic right?
Also what he said to S33 was straight up awful shit.
I know words are difficult for him but deconstruct. "Strickland is the kind of Jew who creates Nazis"
While correct Strickland is the subject he is being defined as a Jew, and what kind of Jew is he, he is the kind of Jew that creates Nazis. So in his sentence there are types of Jews that create Nazis, this isn't contained to just Strickland because its a type. So in this scenario there wouldn't be Nazis unless they were created by Jewish people like Strickland, sounds pretty anti-semitic to me
but isn't this like black people using the N-word? we know rj isn't anti-semitic right?