Beamer's frustration really tells the tale: Having perennial powers that get all the best recruits is an almost impossible situation for the rest.
If you want to create a chance for real parity then allow programs to extend eligibility based on whether the player is in school with some outside maximum of years (4 years undergraduate + 4 years for med school/graduate programs to doctorate level). With the advent of NIL, schools may as well empower the players to keep working at football if they want to play longer while staying in school. This idea has its disadvantages but over time it would undermine the dominance of a few.
Or, create a draft situation similar to the NFL which, while it would require a sea change at the college and player level, it would still be up to the school and player to determine if it is a bad fit and if it is then trade. Trading would limit the ability of the dominant powers to control the landscape. If the SEC continues to drain from others, then The Alliance could always create an entirely different and separate model which is better for the schools and the players and the spectators.
With NIL, bigger changes should at least be considered.
