Why would I be joking?
He's a bastard and he's a Communist. Seems like the shoe fits.
He’s not a communist.
Why would I be joking?
He's a bastard and he's a Communist. Seems like the shoe fits.
it's crimson tide all over the place right now
He’s not a communist.
He’s not a communist.
That makes as much sense as anything else, but nothing really makes much sense about this to me yet.
This whole thing has felt like a massive blunder from the beginning, and I have never been able to comprehend the upside of invading Ukraine. Russia already has Crimea, and they could have deployed "peacekeepers" to Lugansk and Donetsk without much resistance from the rest of Europe and the US, so why strike at Kyiv, Kharkiv, etc.? He must have been counting on slight Ukrainian resistance, but why on earth would someone think that an army fighting on its home soil won't resist? I just don't get it.
I've read that Russian demands at the peace talks were (1) recognition by Ukraine of Russia's annexation of Crimea, (2) "de-nazification" of Ukrainian government (by which I read, "regime change"), and (3) Ukrainian commitment to neutrality. He doesn't really need (1), (2) isn't something that any government would willing agree to under any circumstances, and he probably could have gotten (3) without an invasion outside of Crimea and the Donbass. Now that he's invaded, he will never get (1) or (3) unless he forces (2) at gunpoint, and there's little chance
All I can figure is, sometimes people in heavy echo chambers make big mistakes, and maybe that's what we're witnessing. It's a real tragedy that people have to die for such stupidity.
There are two types of nukes - strategic (long range) and tactical (short range and not always on alert). Russia's deterrent policy was changed a few years back to allow the offensive use of nuclear weapons. And no one has more tactical nukes than Russia. They have about 2000 warheads. That's 9-10x as many as the US. It's also why Belarus should just be put on all the same sanctions as Russia.
So I don't think it rings hollow for the reasons you've cited. I just think he has other options to create massive damage short of using tactical nukes.
why can't NATO or the UN institute a no-fly zone, then
why can't NATO or the UN institute a no-fly zone, then
Are you asking why NATO forces can’t/won’t shoot down Russian aircraft over Ukrainian air space?
Yeah lots of hot takes thinking it’s just a Michael Scott I declare a No Fly Zone and that’s that.