If it was on Meet the Press, he probably was able to dodge it because Chuck Todd was asking the questions.
I was disappointed Todd didn't press him further on the issue.
Dude, I've repeatedly said I'm pro choice. I just arrive at it from a different angle than you.
This is why Dems keep getting their teeth kicked in on every major issue, because you can't even let people in the middle agree with your conclusion unless their overall mindset matches your degree of liberal fanaticism. Republicans will try to take anyone who shares one common nugget of belief and and turn them into a full-party voter (the party of acceptance); Dems try to run off people who agree with their platforms if they just aren't all-around woke enough (the party of look at meeeeeeee). Hence how Pubs have rekindled and are winning something that was mostly decided decades ago that might otherwise just need some updated fine-tuning due to advancements in #science. Pubs will look to see if a person disagrees with any remote scenario of abortion and turn them into an anti-abortion voter; Dems find someone who is pro choice and tells him to fuck off for judging. It really is comical.
While I have no sympathy for Kavanaugh, protesting at someone’s home seems inappropriate to me.
NYT Pitchbot is branching out.
SCOTUS justices don't have office hours, town halls, forums, or even really social media accounts for you to interact with them. they answer to no one but they shouldn't get to act like they're above hearing from the American people with the amount of power they have.
have condoms ever been banned...like, anywhere ever?
Yeah. Griwold v. Connecticut. It was one of the decisions that lead to Roe.