stevewhite14
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,982
- Reaction score
- 185
33 people injured is a hell of a lot different than one fan leaning over railing.
I also hate the argument that car accidents are both deadly and relatively likely, and yet we allow driving, therefore we should allow X activity that is deadly and relatively less likely. As with all activity, we have to be weighing societal gains and losses. I'm not sure what the hell is gained by letting heavy machinery fly around a track at high speeds with thousands of human beings right up against the action.
Just kind of shocked that people are defending NASCAR here, or at least not asking what could be done differently. As with all massive corporations, we should probably ask if they're doing enough for our safety.
Agreed, but the societal losses are minimal IMO with auto racing. Racing has been relatively safe over the past decade. I suspect you can find no other organization that has made the safety advancements that NASCAR has made in the past decade. That's a sport that had participant after participant die in the late 90s and then went and completely redesigned the cars, race track walls, and head restraint gear and almost eliminated serious injuries all-together.
If you want to pick on a sport that has a ton of societal losses, there can be no better example than football. Kids/grown men die on the football field, suffer years of debilitating injuries, and have serious mental health issues. That ignores the crime typically associated with handing kids a bunch of money that they are poorly equipped to handle.