morrison2951
Well-known member
McIlroy +6
Day +7
Ha ha- so much for the top picks! :tard:
Day +7
Ha ha- so much for the top picks! :tard:
Sleepy, has there ever been such a huge wipeout of top people?
Haas -4 with one hole to play (so still time to jinx him!), should put him in good shape entering the weekend. For some reason his record in majors is pretty bad, but maybe this can be his year?
Just looking at the U.S. Opens, the percentage of teams in this contest missing the cut were:
2016: 30%
2015: 24%
2014: 13%
2013: 31%
2012: 39%[/QUOTE
Time once again for my suggestion on the fair method of scoring teams that don't make the cut. If you have 59 teams and 25 of them don't make the cut, those teams shouldn't all score a 35. They should each score a 47.....the average of 35 & 59.
If 4 players tie for 2nd place in a tournament they don't each get 2nd place money. They split 2nd, 3rd, 4th & 5th place money.
In this contest, in the situation listed above it isn't fair to the teams that made the cut and finished, say, 33rd or 34th, to only gain 1 or 2 points over 25 teams that didn't make the cut....some of whom would have had scores 20+ worse if they had all made the cut. In this situation, many teams are actually rewarded with a better score by failing to make the cut.
Teams that don't make the cut should each get the average of all the positions for teams that didn't make the cut.....not all one point more than the last team that made the cut.
Also, I stopped doing cumulative Grand Slam scoring last year, and am not planning on doing it this year.