• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

2023 College Football Coaching Carousel

BarcaDeac

BarcaDeac

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
53,682
Reaction score
17,704
Location
Asheville
I started this one week 2 last year, too

 
Last edited:
LOL. They're going to have to pay him. Maybe not 70 million, but a substantial chunk of it. "Uh, we aren't paying you 70 million because she said you whacked it without consent." Uh, no. You better have something a bit more definitive than that, otherwise you're paying him a couple years of Big 10 distributions.
 
macktheknife said:
The Jimbo Fisher leash has to be in microns today.
Click to expand...

Would not be shocked to see Elko heading to A&M after this season. He sure ain't staying at Duke with anything close to last year's performance.
 
EatLeadCommie said:
LOL. They're going to have to pay him. Maybe not 70 million, but a substantial chunk of it. "Uh, we aren't paying you 70 million because she said you whacked it without consent." Uh, no. You better have something a bit more definitive than that, otherwise you're paying him a couple years of Big 10 distributions.
Click to expand...

I’m certain his contract has a “morality clause” and it would absolutely void the contract.
 
He was trying to have an extra-martial relationship. Is that grounds for termination? Is having consensual phone sex grounds for termination? Yes, he exercised horrible judgment in trying to get involved with her, but she accepted a $200 Venmo payment, talked to him 27 times for approximately 30 minutes, and according to Tucker, wanted a sugar daddy. Then, after the last phone call in August, deleted her text messages with Tucker. The only person who could possibly corroborate any complaints made by her prior the August phone call is now deceased. Her attorney’s notes from their first zoom call listed Tucker as “D1” and MSU as “D2”. This is attorney abbreviation for “defendant.” From the facts reported in the USA article, a finder of fact will have a difficult time being persuaded that she meets her burden of proof.
 
Is 22 implying she was running a $7/min phone sex line?
 
I am attorney 22, when you’re a sexual predator you have a lot of problems, you have bitches to worry about and the lawsuits don’t stop coming. You have one opportunity to ruin the reputation of your accuser. Don’t make a costly mistake that can affect your freedom. We fight to get you the defense you need to keep the lifestyle you lead. Sexual assault survivors know the name 22. Call 1-800-HER-FALT
 
wfu22fan said:
He was trying to have an extra-martial relationship. Is that grounds for termination? Is having consensual phone sex grounds for termination? Yes, he exercised horrible judgment in trying to get involved with her, but she accepted a $200 Venmo payment, talked to him 27 times for approximately 30 minutes, and according to Tucker, wanted a sugar daddy. Then, after the last phone call in August, deleted her text messages with Tucker. The only person who could possibly corroborate any complaints made by her prior the August phone call is now deceased. Her attorney’s notes from their first zoom call listed Tucker as “D1” and MSU as “D2”. This is attorney abbreviation for “defendant.” From the facts reported in the USA article, a finder of fact will have a difficult time being persuaded that she meets her burden of proof.
Click to expand...
Was it 27 times for a total of 30 minutes? If so, that sounds like harassment.
 
BarcaDeac said:
Wonder what kind of law 22 practices
Click to expand...
PhDeac said:
Is 22 implying she was running a $7/min phone sex line?
Click to expand...
I’m skeptical of her claims. Why pile on the guy before he has a hearing and eventually a civil suit vs MSU to get ALL of the facts out? If he is telling the truth, it’s nothing more than consensual phone sex with a lady who spoke with him extensively over the phone (late at night) 27 times and wanted a rich sugar daddy. She knew he was married. It was improper for her to be talking that often to a married man. He’s exercised horrible judgment and has betrayed his wife, hurt his family and embarrassed MSU. I’m just not convinced that she’s telling the truth based on the USA Today article, and that’s all the information available at present.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top