FckVwls
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2012
- Messages
- 2,988
- Reaction score
- 194
Those that are advocating forgetting the Tulsa assistants due to their thin resumes and bringing on a new staff:
That would only amplify the risk factor of a Manning hire. Tulsa showed some very nice player development and generally strong statistical tendencies last year. What if the assistants, although they don't have thick coaching resumes, were largely responsible for that? Manning with 3 new assistants would be a much more unknown entity.
If it were up to me I would keep his two main Tulsa assistants on board and hire the best external recruiter I could acquire for last spot on the staff.
ETA: Unless Manning thinks Woodberry was the star of his Tulsa staff and he'd be better off with 2 externals. Obviously he would know best.
That would only amplify the risk factor of a Manning hire. Tulsa showed some very nice player development and generally strong statistical tendencies last year. What if the assistants, although they don't have thick coaching resumes, were largely responsible for that? Manning with 3 new assistants would be a much more unknown entity.
If it were up to me I would keep his two main Tulsa assistants on board and hire the best external recruiter I could acquire for last spot on the staff.
ETA: Unless Manning thinks Woodberry was the star of his Tulsa staff and he'd be better off with 2 externals. Obviously he would know best.
Last edited: