DirkTheDeac
Lord of the Board
- Joined
- May 3, 2011
- Messages
- 8,892
- Reaction score
- 345
Who cares. It could easily be Washington DC.
Who cares. It could easily be Washington DC.
Which country is that picture from?
Why is saying that his girlfriend got an abortion "slamming" her RJ? Having an abortion is legal. If I put up a billboard that stated "Here is a picture of the steak I would have eaten tonight if my wife didn't purchase tofu instead" would there be any more outrage?
Abortion is legal, this guy is stating a fact that occurred in a public manner. Personally I think you feel this publicity is atrocious because deep down you realize that having an abortion is reprehensible. If having an abortion is not ending a life, I don't understand why this is a reprehensible act. If having an abortion IS ending a life, then I completely understand that outrage. Which is it?
Why is saying that his girlfriend got an abortion "slamming" her RJ? Having an abortion is legal. If I put up a billboard that stated "Here is a picture of the steak I would have eaten tonight if my wife didn't purchase tofu instead" would there be any more outrage?
Abortion is legal, this guy is stating a fact that occurred in a public manner. Personally I think you feel this publicity is atrocious because deep down you realize that having an abortion is reprehensible. If having an abortion is not ending a life, I don't understand why this is a reprehensible act. If having an abortion IS ending a life, then I completely understand that outrage. Which is it?
Really...a steak and a baby?
You are not upset about the medical records angle RJ....give me a break. You are upset because this is offensive. If he put up a sign that said that his girlfriend had toe jam you wouldn't care. You are upset because it is calling out abortions.
ONW - my point is that pro-choice people believe that a baby isn't a baby if it is aborted...it is simply a parasite I guess to the mother's body. I am simply confirming that line of thinking. I don't agree with it, but I honestly believe that most pro-choice people do believe that. I certainly would hate to think that pro-choice means pro-killing babies.
So if this is simply a choice of removing an unwanted parasite, then I don't understand that big deal. If you aren't doing something morally reprehensible then why get upset about what happened? Again, if this a billboard that said that his girlfriend had the flu and wouldn't hook up with him last night, I doubt RJ would be so upset. It is the abortion angle that has caught his attention...rightfully so in my opinion. But the mere recognition that it is the abortion that caused the uprising, is a major clue to where the real conflict lies on this issue.
You are not upset about the medical records angle RJ....give me a break. You are upset because this is offensive. If he put up a sign that said that his girlfriend had toe jam you wouldn't care. You are upset because it is calling out abortions.
ONW - my point is that pro-choice people believe that a baby isn't a baby if it is aborted...it is simply a parasite I guess to the mother's body. I am simply confirming that line of thinking. I don't agree with it, but I honestly believe that most pro-choice people do believe that. I certainly would hate to think that pro-choice means pro-killing babies.
So if this is simply a choice of removing an unwanted parasite, then I don't understand that big deal. If you aren't doing something morally reprehensible then why get upset about what happened? Again, if this a billboard that said that his girlfriend had the flu and wouldn't hook up with him last night, I doubt RJ would be so upset. It is the abortion angle that has caught his attention...rightfully so in my opinion. But the mere recognition that it is the abortion that caused the uprising, is a major clue to where the real conflict lies on this issue.
So Rep Weiner would have been better off putting his junk on a billboard?
Ask his hawt new wife about her opinion on his moral compass.
Would you be more opposed to a billboard of a penis or an abortion?
Why must I make this bizarre choice? I'll politely decline, on grounds of absurdity.
If I'm not mistaken, it's against the law to put people's medical information in the public realm without permission.
I do find putting anything about anyone's medical history on a billboard highly offensive.