Deacfreak07
Ain't played nobody, PAWL!
I think we are firmly on the Super Lesgue bubble. Need more Q1 media viewership wins.This would be the absolute best outcome Wake could possibly hope for.
I think we are firmly on the Super Lesgue bubble. Need more Q1 media viewership wins.This would be the absolute best outcome Wake could possibly hope for.
We got that Toyota ad that aired during NFL gamesI think we are firmly on the Super Lesgue bubble. Need more Q1 media viewership wins.
I agree. But I don't see the SEC and Big 10 agreeing to it.
I hope soBut I could see the new Big XII and ACC plus the PAC-2 agreeing to it if the money is right which could pressure the SEC and Big Ten to join for the big pay day.
Do they know about the % increase in our fanbase?I think we end up with a Super League
I have some sauces that predicted a Super League like outcome a year or 2 ago
Wake would be on the bubble, but my understanding is that teams could earn their way in/out of the top 60 or 70 based on performance
Well this particular Super League proposal includes all P5 school in the top 70 with permanent statusI think we end up with a Super League
I have some sauces that predicted a Super League like outcome a year or 2 ago
Wake would be on the bubble, but my understanding is that teams could earn their way in/out of the top 60 or 70 based on performance
You get docked credibility points for not making nepo hires and any seats over 6KI think we end up with a Super League
I have some sauces that predicted a Super League like outcome a year or 2 ago
Wake would be on the bubble, but my understanding is that teams could earn their way in/out of the top 60 or 70 based on performance
some kind of combination of conferences, an alliance, if you willBut I could see the new Big XII and ACC plus the PAC-2 agreeing to it if the money is right which could pressure the SEC and Big Ten to join for the big pay day.
some kind of combination of conferences, an alliance, if you will
3 million and growing fans is a Q1 win in my bookDo they know about the % increase in our fanbase?
I have heard of some of these schoolsMercyhurst University (Erie, PA) is moving to division 1 effective next year and joining the NEC. The 2024-25 NEC:
-Central Connecticut State
-Le Moyne
-Fairleigh Dickinson
-Wagner
-LIU
-Saint Francis (PA)
-Stonehill
-Chicago State
-Mercyhurst
Gross. NEC has now lost Sacred Heat (MAAC), Merrimack (MAAC), St. Francis Brooklyn (dropped athletics), Mount St. Mary's (MAAC), Bryant (America East) and Robert Morris (Horizon) in the last 4 years.
NEC is at the absolute bottom of division 1 conferences, and as such receive the ultimate impact of realignment. So they are going to D2 schools to supplement their ranks, with mixed success. Merrimack was a good addition. Mercyhurst and Le Moyne might not be.I have heard of some of these schools
ACC wins an early-round in the litigation against FSU. It's a long-ass opinion, over 70 pages, but in short:
You can find the ruling on-line. In the short-term, this means that this will be a long drawn out battle if a settlement isn't agreed upon.
- Rejected that the ACC didn't follow its bylaws when its sued FSU in NC
- No soverign immunity for FSU
- FSU can't challenge the ACC media deals after profiting off of them for the past few years
- ACC has standing to sue FSU
Link to the story
Another link
Link to the 76 page decision
I have heard of some of these schools
Might this aspect of the ruling impact Clemson's suit?ACC wins an early-round in the litigation against FSU. It's a long-ass opinion, over 70 pages, but in short:
You can find the ruling on-line. In the short-term, this means that this will be a long drawn out battle if a settlement isn't agreed upon.
- Rejected that the ACC didn't follow its bylaws when its sued FSU in NC
- No soverign immunity for FSU
- FSU can't challenge the ACC media deals after profiting off of them for the past few years
- ACC has standing to sue FSU
It could, but today's ruling was made in NC state court and Clemson's suit was filed in SC state court. So, technically, the SC court is not bound by the ruling of the NC court, particularly if any of the issues raised in the Clemson suit would be decided by applying SC law, but as a general proposition, courts don't like to decide something that another court already decided. So, the answer is a luke-warm maybe.Might this aspect of the ruling impact Clemson's suit?