dartsndeacs
THE quintessential dwarf
I read somewhere that 80% of ventilator patients end up dying, if that's true, why are ventilators so important? Seems tests would be significantly more important
I read somewhere that 80% of ventilator patients end up dying, if that's true, why are ventilators so important? Seems tests would be significantly more important
I read somewhere that 80% of ventilator patients end up dying, if that's true, why are ventilators so important? Seems tests would be significantly more important
Italy continues to make small progress towards flattening the curve. New cases day over day are down 12%. Total new cases up less than 6%. It is really sad to call them a "success" right now given the how devastating each day is there. But they are making progress. New cases today were just over 5,200. Only 2 days in the 10 days prior had fewer new cases. 6 of the 10 prior days had new cases in excess of 5,500. Really want to see them make even more progress. One thing that worries me (and concerns me for the US) is how the cases have been largely in one area. Do not want to see a big wave migrate to the South.
I read somewhere that 80% of ventilator patients end up dying, if that's true, why are ventilators so important? Seems tests would be significantly more important
I feel sorry for the kids (and the people they will infect.)
And this is why we should withdraw Liberty from the football and basketball schedule. These poor kids are being used in Fallwell’s political stand against the media and Fauci’s cautionary statements in opposition to dear leader. I feel bad for those kids and all the other kids and people they are going to infect.
Running beneath it all, in a continuous loop through our national psyche, are basic questions leaders are struggling to answer: When can we safely lift these quarantines? How many people could die if we do it too early? Just how dangerous will this pandemic turn out to be? And what exactly should be our next step?
This is why epidemiology exists. Its practitioners use math and scientific principles to understand disease, project its consequences, and figure out ways to survive and overcome it. Their models are not meant to be crystal balls predicting exact numbers or dates. They forecast how diseases will spread under different conditions. And their models allow policymakers to foresee challenges, understand trend lines and make the best decisions for the public good.
But one factor many modelers failed to predict was how politicized their work would become in the era of President Trump, and how that in turn could affect their models.
Nonetheless, a new model released Thursday by the University of Washington’s School of Medicine is one of the first to forecast a national peak. It projects that the peak in daily U.S. deaths will arrive in mid-April, and the tail end of that curve, subsiding below 10 daily deaths, will arrive by the first week of June.
But that projection comes with huge caveats because of estimations and assumptions that have to be built into the calculation, given how much is still unknown about the disease covid-19.
The model — created by the university’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation — assumes, for example, that all remaining states that have not enacted strict restrictions on residents will do so in the next week once they see how grave the situation is in areas like New York.
But Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) has refused to issue orders for people to stay at home. Alabama’s governor has similarly resisted. And this week, Mississippi’s governor issued an order defining almost all businesses as “essential” — including auto repair, bars and restaurants.