• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Donald Impeachment

This is great and all, BUUUUUUUT

giphy.gif
 
 
The inquiry isn’t one sided. Most of the members may have already made up their mind on whether they will impeach but the GOP is able to (and has been) asking questions. Simply because the House isn’t calling Hunter Biden to testify (which is pretty irrelevant to the quid pro quo analysis to start with since the accusation is whether Donald asked for an investigation into the Bidens in exchange for foreign aid not whether Donald had good faith beliefs for doing so) doesn’t mean the inquiry is one sided.

Sailor what do you make of those witnesses who have testified so far? Haven’t even seen many conservatives attacking them substantively. Do you find them credible sources information? If not why?
 
Wakeforest22890 said:
The inquiry isn’t one sided. Most of the members may have already made up their mind on whether they will impeach but the GOP is able to (and has been) asking questions. Simply because the House isn’t calling Hunter Biden to testify (which is pretty irrelevant to the quid pro quo analysis to start with since the accusation is whether Donald asked for an investigation into the Bidens in exchange for foreign aid not whether Donald had good faith beliefs for doing so) doesn’t mean the inquiry is one sided.

Sailor what do you make of those witnesses who have testified so far? Haven’t even seen many conservatives attacking them substantively. Do you find them credible sources information? If not why?
Click to expand...

boring, now you've got him, TDS lubish hysteria
 
Wakeforest22890 said:
The inquiry isn’t one sided. Most of the members may have already made up their mind on whether they will impeach but the GOP is able to (and has been) asking questions. Simply because the House isn’t calling Hunter Biden to testify (which is pretty irrelevant to the quid pro quo analysis to start with since the accusation is whether Donald asked for an investigation into the Bidens in exchange for foreign aid not whether Donald had good faith beliefs for doing so) doesn’t mean the inquiry is one sided.

Sailor what do you make of those witnesses who have testified so far? Haven’t even seen many conservatives attacking them substantively. Do you find them credible sources information? If not why?
Click to expand...

lol
 
Let's take a look at the Republican defense.

1. Trump loves Ukraine because he sent them missiles and Obama didn't!
-Ignores the withheld aid and WH meeting.

2. The aid was released and the investigation never happened.
-Aid was only released after whistle blower concerns were revealed.
-WH meeting has still not happened.

3. This is all third party information.
-Those with first-hand knowledge refuse to comply with subpoenas.
 
Seems like the Democrats have enough to connect dots that Trump took a foreign bribe.

Parnas and Fruman gave Trump an illegal donation. They wanted the ambassador out. Trump slandered her and removed her.

Not difficult.

It’s hilarious that Republicans are desperate to turn Stefanik into a victim. They blatantly attempted to circumvent the rules and got called out and played the victim.
 
The Republicans are so frustrated that they can't land a jab much less a punch against her.
 
JuiceCrewAllStar said:
the "lol at expecting anything from Republicans" is close cousin to "why try?" and is no longer compelling content

please be advised
Click to expand...

The “lol” was at asking sailor a question. That dude had never earnestly answered a question in his life.

But to your point, literally the only thing that matters is turnout for Democratic candidates next year. Until then, ain’t nothin gonna happen. Even if folks turnout next year, the senate might be irreversibly broken.
 
Last edited:
It's amazing how many Republican arguments revolve around Trump's feelings.

Trump's obstruction of justice in the Russia investigation is OK because he was frustrated.

Trump's tweets insulting a woman he fired is OK because he's annoyed with the situation.

Trump's withholding of $100s of millions of aid is OK because he was sad that some Ukrainians criticized him.
 
avalon said:
It's amazing how many Republican arguments revolve around Trump's feelings.

Trump's obstruction of justice in the Russia investigation is OK because he was frustrated.

Trump's tweets insulting a woman he fired is OK because he's annoyed with the situation.

Trump's withholding of $100s of millions of aid is OK because he was sad that some Ukrainians criticized him.
Click to expand...

It's bizarre and seems like a strong argument that Trump is unfit for the office.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top