TownieDeac
words are futile devices
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 76,189
- Reaction score
- 16,924
But we do have decades and trillions of dollars of corresponding Democrat social welfare programs purported to meet those goals that go alongside those stats. Thinking that one of those programs is actually and suddenly going to work at the exact same time the abolition program kicks in is pure insanity. The programs simply don't work, and you can go round and round with the chicken and egg on if it is the poverty or the police state that is causing the failure, but whatever the conclusion isn't going to suddenly make any of those programs work. So pulling out the police leg of the chair is going to cause the collapse the same way as if you pulled the welfare funding leg or the education funding leg.
We have decades and trillions of dollars of means-tested and misappropriated welfare spending (undercut at every level by Dems and Pubs alike) combined with a system that still criminalizes poverty. Welfare spending isn't meant to stop crime, but we do know that a lot of crime has its roots in basic needs not being met (and not simply a static condition inherent to all societies). Why, if we've spent so much money do we still have generational poverty? Precisely because we still criminalize so many parts of being poor. I'd prefer a ladder metaphor, wherein education and welfare funding are rungs out of poverty, and police are gatekeepers sitting atop the wall refusing to let a certain underclass climb any higher.
There is really good data about how the CARES act boost to UI benefits has, as a direct cash application, done more to address local poverty than any other previously implemented attempts. The very existence of poverty is a policy decision.