bym051d
I AM VERY IMPORTANT
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 39,475
- Reaction score
- 5,312
We have no idea what Mueller agrees with or not. The investigation isn’t over.
Mueller should just ask Sailor. Sailor's not seen any evidence of wrongdoing.
We have no idea what Mueller agrees with or not. The investigation isn’t over.
Mueller just drew his most direct line to date between the Trump campaign and Russia
Here's the paragraph:
Truly a nothingburger from Amazon/Bezos/ Wapo
The article plainly states that he is not a military agent but it does use rampant speculation which, to the feeble lib mind, is equal to a fact. If somebody suggests something then run with it. This will be forgotten as fast as you can say “Erik Prince”
Desperation has set in for Mueller as he has long realized he has nothing but charges of money misuse years before the election and the campaign preceding it”
Fourth, the lies and withholding of documents were material to the Special Counsel’s Office’s investigation. That Gates and Person A were directly communicating in September and October 2016 was pertinent to the investigation. Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agents assisting the Special Counsel’s Office assess that Person A has ties to Russian intelligence service and had such ties in 2016. During his first interview with the Special Counsel’s Office, van der Zwaan admitted that he knew of that connection, stating that Gates told him Person A was a former Russian Intelligence Officer with GRU.
That Person A has had ties to Russian intelligence is not terribly surprising. Kilimnik's personal history has been examined extensively by the media, including The Washington Post. He has denied being involved in Russian intelligence, but he served in the Russian military and attended a Russian military foreign language university that is seen as a breeding ground for intelligence agents.
What's particularly significant in the Mueller filing, though, are six words: “and had such ties in 2016.” Prosecutors have said previously that a longtime Manafort and Gates associate had ties to Russian intelligence, but they have never said those ties remained during the 2016 campaign. In December, they said this associate was “a longtime Russian colleague . . . who is currently based in Russia and assessed to have ties to a Russian intelligence service.” Why those six words were added in this filing when they didn't appear in a previous filing is the $64,000 question.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...p-campaign-and-russia/?utm_term=.c9b126c96a52
Lectro, you are a terrible poster, both in substance and in form.
What do you find to be irrational? The idea that Russia wanted to influence our election or that Trump's team and family would love to work with them on doing so?
How did they use the dossier to influence the election?