• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

First Charges Filed in Mueller Investigation

No lawyer representing Trump would ever want him to testify. Even a pseudo lawyer like Giuliani understands the risk of putting a habitual liar under oath.
 
No lawyer representing Trump would ever want him to testify. Even a pseudo lawyer like Giuliani understands the risk of putting a habitual liar under oath.

Oh yea..”pseudo lawyer” who as US Federal Prosecutor led the takedown of the Gambino and Gotti crime family — with his own life in the cross-hairs.

Sure..he just knows the bullshit Weissman is known for - seems that character has had his own convictions appealed and overturned 9 to Zero by the Supreme Court. This consequence of his riding dirty at trial by hiding exculpatory evidence and using brown-shirt tactics in the pre-dawn no-knock-arms drawn raid of Manafort and his wife.

Prog-Nazi’s such as yourself like to cheer that loathesome behaviour
 
Hmm.

I’m in favor of finding out what’s true and the idea that no one should be above the law.


Not really a popular notion, especially in Trumpublican fantasy land.
 
Hmm.

I’m in favor of finding out what’s true and the idea that no one should be above the law.


Not really a popular notion, especially in Trumpublican fantasy land.

You are nothing of the sort. You are an obfuscator who is afraid of the facts in this case.

You have no truth in your search..only as it appears to confirm your preconceived notions which are based on some slip-shod and thin as gruel reportage
 
Man, Trumpublicans project like it’s an inbred trait.

Says Conor Hapsburg

Projection is the Left’s primary.

Massively collude with Russians,work around CFIUS to secure Uranium deals,exclaim (“He likes me!”) as Hillary said of Vlad having invited her into his sanctum sanctorum during her famous Russian re-set

No,Projection is a central Marxist tenet and is the Progressive’s calling card.

That ^ and the baseless smear are perhaps the only tools a lazy Lefty actually knows how to use.
 
And thus we see our possible doom.

Intransigent ignorance, filled with misguided passion.

Sad stuff.

We have to figure out how to better educate ourselves as a people.

Bye—enjoy the last word.
 
And thus we see our possible doom.

Intransigent ignorance, filled with misguided passion.

Sad stuff.

We have to figure out how to better educate ourselves as a people.

Bye—enjoy the last word.

That’s rich. Spout some untranslatable garble,sprinkle generously with 5 dollar words and then ceremoniously “Huff-Po” as you take your ball and go home.

Better you do that..it beats youtubing C-Spans testimony of Glenn Simpson where he claims to barely know Bruce and Nellie Ohr. That lie is going to explode — and poor Bruce,who complained to Steele,that the ongoing testimony of Strozk,Simpson and McCabe,et.al., was threatening to breach their protective wall of secrecy.

So yea,Conor,when you begin to learn the names and actions of players like Veselnistkaya,Oleg Deripaska,Glenn Simpson,Bruce and Nellie Ohr..when I hear you,in the search for real transparency,enlist these names then I will know that the egg shell you inhabit has begun to crack.
 
Spout some untranslatable garble,sprinkle generously with 5 dollar words.

This is perhaps the best description of lectro's posting style that I've read.

Add also egregious use of punctuation and spacing, superfluous name-dropping, and irrelevant and usually misapprehendsd references to obscure theorists and books.
 
So McCabe knowingly sabatagoed his FBI career, knew he was going to get fired, but get a one-time $500,000 crowed sourced legal defense fund? That’s your evidence for his “motivations?”


Seems like a really dumb plan, dude.

How many times does it have to be said? They thought she was sure to win, and so the risk was minimal to non-existent. They were fools, just like you. They should be easy for you to relate to.

Crowd sourced legal defense fund? Where have you been? The McCabe better half got over half million from Clinton Foundation money launderers.

Yeah, a half million bucks and the hope of being promoted to head of FBI is plenty of incentive for a swamp creature like McCabe.
 
This is perhaps the best description of lectro's posting style that I've read.

Add also egregious use of punctuation and spacing, superfluous name-dropping, and irrelevant and usually misapprehendsd references to obscure theorists and books.

You need to climb out of that moldy basement kid - the dampness is worsening your pleurisy.

I suggest sunlight as a disinfectant for your malaise and general disenchantment with reality based living
 
A lot of corrections are necessary with your post, W&B.

1. Yeah, as a matter of fact, you do win promotions by helping the boss, or in this case the presumed soon-to-be boss. Trying to spy on your opponent's campaign is not exactly new in American politics. The extent of compromising the DoJ, the FBI, the intelligence services, the DoS and who knows what else is, however, rather impressive. Let's hope that it is exceptional, too.

2. The FBI leadership criminal cabal held on to the Weiner laptop e-mails until they thought it would have little impact on the election. Remember, they knew about the e-mails for about a month before announcing that they were obliged to examine them. Looks like they goofed again.

3. What are you talking about not using the Steele dossier? They fed it to the FBI, which then used it to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump's campaign and later his transition. They legalized opposition research trach and then compromised the FISA courts with it. What a bunch of scoundrels, true swamp creatures.

The week before the election is low-impact?

#3 is equally ridiculous. Handing it over to the FBI is not leaking it to the voters. You’re wasting all of our time with that.

Despite all of that, let’s look more closely at your example of motivation for the “deep state” to want to undermine a Trump candidacy and presidency. In #1 you have hitched your wagon to the idea that high-achieving individuals in the FBI would risk their jobs, pensions, and credibility for the outside chance the incoming president would see it fit to promote them for illegal activity that may have had a marginal impact on helping you win. Particularly HIllary Clinton, who was told in no uncertain terms by her political opponents that her presidency would be besieged by crippling investigations and probes. And these same FBI agents later did address the voters with damaging information to the very same candidate they were pinning their hopes for promotion onto, one week before the election, the “little impact” period known in previous elections as October Surprise time.

And elaborate on examples of other FBI men and women who meddled in campaigns to achieve promotion.
 
How many times does it have to be said? They thought she was sure to win, and so the risk was minimal to non-existent. They were fools, just like you. They should be easy for you to relate to.

Crowd sourced legal defense fund? Where have you been? The McCabe better half got over half million from Clinton Foundation money launderers.

Yeah, a half million bucks and the hope of being promoted to head of FBI is plenty of incentive for a swamp creature like McCabe.

Yep. They gambled on what was supposed to have been a sure thing. Now,their own decisions are returning upon them to grind them down until they admit the truth of their treasonous ways
 
How many times does it have to be said? They thought she was sure to win, and so the risk was minimal to non-existent. They were fools, just like you. They should be easy for you to relate to.

Crowd sourced legal defense fund? Where have you been? The McCabe better half got over half million from Clinton Foundation money launderers.

Yeah, a half million bucks and the hope of being promoted to head of FBI is plenty of incentive for a swamp creature like McCabe.

So if they already got the money from Clinton and it was all washed, and they were certain she would win, why take any risk at all, him or Clinton? Do you understand the concept of risk/reward at all? Have you ever been employed and gotten promoted? It’s as if you are a parody but you clearly are not. None of this makes any sense, its the worst conspiracy theory since “OJ was framed by Mark Furman and the LAPD.” Its lunacy
 
Just no point in arguing with tin foil-hatted folks.


You’re an idiot. No, your an idiot.


Just doesn’t get anyone anywhere.
 
Back
Top