Newenglanddeac
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
- Messages
- 13,135
- Reaction score
- 390
A federal judge has decided that Manafort made at least three lies about contacts with Russians to Mueller and the Grand Jury. His deal is now off and he's likely to be sentenced to spend most of the rest of his life in federal prison.
These issues dealt with Kilimnik and other Russian contacts. Basically, this federal judge is alleging Manafort's conspiracy with Russia.
Collusion isn't a crime. Conspiracy is.
I forgot Burr went all in for Trump after the Access Hollywood tape.
https://www.justsecurity.org/62573/...ip-senates-russia-investigation-disintegrate/
I can't say I'm totally familiar with agency law and even if it would be applicable here (so please, lawyers that have actually graduated law school and are practicing, inform me), but at some point, wouldn't there be a pretty standard agent/principal liability issue that ties all this directly to Trump irrespective of whether one can actually definitively prove that Trump had direct knowledge?
I can't say I'm totally familiar with agency law and even if it would be applicable here (so please, lawyers that have actually graduated law school and are practicing, inform me), but at some point, wouldn't there be a pretty standard agent/principal liability issue that ties all this directly to Trump irrespective of whether one can actually definitively prove that Trump had direct knowledge?
Would be interested to hear from some board legal eagles as well.
First thing that comes to mind here is RICO.
Agency law would not apply in the criminal context
There’s nothing suspicious about meeting with Russian GRU in the midst of a campaign and then exiting the meeting location through three separate doors. Then lying about it for two straight years, even under the microscope of an investigation.
I’m sure this was all above board.
Sailor scratches sailing cap