• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

How the CIA's fake vaccine campaign to catch Bin Laden endangers us all

TownieDeac

words are futile devices
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
76,189
Reaction score
16,923
Article in Scientific American - http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-cia-fake-vaccination-campaign-endangers-us-all/

How the CIA’s Fake Vaccination Campaign Endangers Us All
The U.S. was wrong to use health workers to target Osama bin Laden
Apr 16, 2013

Not long after midnight on May 2, 2011, U.S. Navy SEALs attacked a three-story compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, raced to the main building's top floor and killed Osama bin Laden. Few mourn the man responsible for the slaughter of many thousands of innocent people worldwide over the years. But the operation that led to his death may yet kill hundreds of thousands more. In its zeal to identify bin Laden or his family, the CIA used a sham hepatitis B vaccination project to collect DNA in the neighborhood where he was hiding. The effort apparently failed, but the violation of trust threatens to set back global public health efforts by decades.

It is hard enough to distribute, for example, polio vaccines to children in desperately poor, politically unstable regions that are rife with 10-year-old rumors that the medicine is a Western plot to sterilize girls—false assertions that have long since been repudiated by the Nigerian religious leaders who first promoted them. Now along come numerous credible reports of a vaccination campaign that is part of a CIA plot—one the U.S. has not denied.

The deadly consequences have already begun. Villagers along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border chased off legitimate vaccine workers, accusing them of being spies. Taliban commanders banned polio vaccinations in parts of Pakistan, specifically citing the bin Laden ruse as justification. Then, last December, nine vaccine workers were murdered in Pakistan, eventually prompting the United Nations to withdraw its vaccination teams. Two months later gunmen killed 10 polio workers in Nigeria—a sign that the violence against vaccinators may be spreading.

Such attacks could not come at a worse time. The global polio campaign has entered what should be its final stages. The number of cases has dropped from 350,000 in 1988 to 650 in 2011. The disease spreads naturally in only three countries—Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria—down from more than 125 countries a quarter of a century ago. Disrupting or postponing vaccination efforts could fan a resurgence of polio around the world.

The distrust sowed by the sham campaign in Pakistan could conceivably postpone polio eradication for 20 years, leading to 100,000 more cases that might otherwise not have occurred, says Leslie F. Roberts of Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. “Forevermore, people would say this disease, this crippled child is because the U.S. was so crazy to get Osama bin Laden,” he argues.

The vaccination ruse also poses a moral problem. Physicians take a Hippocratic oath to do no harm. Humanitarian workers adhere to an international code of conduct that requires that their services be provided independently of national agendas, on the basis of need alone. The misguided vaccine program in Pakistan was started in a poor neighborhood of Abbottabad, no doubt to give it an air of legitimacy. Yet after the first in a standard series of three hepatitis B shots was given, the effort was abandoned so that the team could move to bin Laden's wealthier community. This lapse in protocol proves that the best interests of the recipients were not the guiding principle of the effort—while not coincidently betraying the program for the sham it was.

There must be a red line drawn between humanitarian efforts and the machinations of warfare, no matter how unconventional. The costs to future humanitarian endeavors, global stability and U.S. national security of doing otherwise are too high—even when weighed against the liquidation of one of the U.S.'s most fearsome enemies and even if no other option is available. As outlined in a letter signed by the deans of a dozen prominent schools of public health that was sent to the White House, President Barack Obama should direct all U.S. military and intelligence agencies to refrain from using a medical or humanitarian cover to achieve their objectives. Such efforts are bad medicine and bad spy craft. A wise leader would disavow them.
 
I agree with the author.

We rightfully complain when the bad guys use innocent civilians as human shields, hide amongst civilians before and after launching attacks, use Mosques and other protected places to stage and launch attacks, etc.

The tactics set forth in the article is too akin to that type of conduct for me.
 
very interesting, and also not surprising coming from the same organization that tortured people with LSD for months on end, conducted clandestine assassinations across the globe, sheltered crack dealers, and introduced syphilis into some US cities.
 
How's this then:

Its amazing that people who rely on foreigners to give them basic vaccines haven't been darwined out of the equation already.
 
Also, for fuck's sake, TAB, I never thought I'd see you swing into social Darwinism.

I know you've got a "fuck everything" approach, but Jesus, dude.
 
How's this then:

Its amazing that people who rely on foreigners to give them basic vaccines haven't been darwined out of the equation already.

Agreed. And did we do anything to harm the innocent people that we're a part of the program? No.

So who the fuck cares. He dead.
 
Is the alleged harm a chilling effect on the otherwise vaccination-inclined, who will now be denied access to vaccines because of their "local leadership"? Can't they be alternatively sourced? It seems if WHO or their ilk could come in under a UN flag, win-win-win, no?
 
we need to figure out how to launch tiny vaccine darts from drones, like amazonian tribesmen

lens1275227_1239403873Tribespeople_with_blowguns.jpg
 
very interesting, and also not surprising coming from the same organization that tortured people with LSD for months on end, conducted clandestine assassinations across the globe, sheltered crack dealers, and introduced syphilis into some US cities.

Sounds like the allegations against the Dook LAX team.
 
Which allegations? some are extremely well documented, "CIA atrocities" turns up 5 million results in google. I could find references for every allegation, but my understanding was every one of them was a known fact--nothing controversial in my post that I'm aware of.
 
[ramble]

the theme of this, that the CIA believes the ends justify the means, is worth talking about at length because it's been their mentality since inception, and as the article suggests the trade-offs may not be worth it. Similar practices were specifically one of the factors in Ed Snowden's decision to defect. He could no longer in good conscience claim he held the moral high ground.

This is a great example of whether the means do justify the ends. For 2/3rds of its history, the CIA has been operating the the context of the cold war, so some of the atrocities committed would have absolutely seemed justified at the time. In this case though, the need to kill bin Laden was purely symbolic and maybe for closure for a few thousand Americans who needed it. Everyone knew he had long been marginalized to the point of mere figurehead, and was thus no longer a direct national security threat...but the CIA was/is still willing to jeopardize public health abroad for little more than a PR triumph.

I don't mean to downplay bin Laden's death or the significance of symbolism, only to raise the question (that the article prompted in my mind) of if it was worth it. Truth is before smallpox was eradicated it killed many more in a given year than a dozen bin Ladens (and unlike smallpox at least bin Laden had an agenda and could be predicted), and its eradication is one of the major triumphs of humankind.

Apparently reported cases of polio have surged, so if polio really was about to go the way of smallpox, and the U.S. is interfering with that in any way, then the reasons for that should be questioned.

You can argue how important getting bin Laden was, but what is inarguable is that masking hostile intent over a veneer of public health/safety represents a serious dilemma (this has happened with the red cross more than once) and that makes this thread a good proving ground for arguments pertaining to that dilemma.

[/ramble]
 
Last edited:
The way the CIA handled Iran, overthrowing the democratically elected Shah to ensure the BP pipeline is perhaps the leading or second leading root cause of Middle East terror today.
 
The way the CIA handled Iran, overthrowing the democratically elected Shah to ensure the BP pipeline is perhaps the leading or second leading root cause of Middle East terror today.

It was a major factor along with Israel's existence. The current series of problems can also trace their beginnings back to Bush 41 creating the first Gulf War and then putting US troops in the "holy Land" of Saudi Arabia. OBL and others referenced having US troops (and even worse female US troops) there as a huge insult and major inciting factor.

Yes, Bush 41 did create the first Gulf War. Saddam asked US Ambassador April Gallaspie what the US reaction would be if he invaded Kuwait. He was told it would be a "Middle Eastern issue". Had he told Saddam that would kick him out of Kuwait, chase him back to Baghdad and keep him under our thumb, Saddam wouldn't have invaded and there wouldn't have been a war. There never would have been US troops in Saudi Arabia.
 
Back
Top