IamThunderbolt
Well-known member
Thought I'd put this here as well.
It's long, but well worth watching:
It's long, but well worth watching:
In 1988, Alice Lakwena established the Holy Spirit Movement, a resistance movement claimed to be inspired by the Holy Spirit of God. She portrayed herself as a prophet who received messages from the Holy Spirit of God. She expressed the belief that the Acholi could defeat the government run by Yoweri Museveni by casting off witchcraft and spiritualism embedded in their culture. According to her messages from God, her followers should cover their bodies with shea nut oil as protection from bullets, never take cover or retreat in battle, and never kill snakes or bees.[21]
Joseph Kony would later preach a similar superstition encouraging soldiers to use oil to draw a cross on their chest as a protection from bullets. During an interview Alice Lakwena distanced herself from Kony, claiming that the spirit doesn’t want them to kill civilians or prisoners of war. Kony sought to align himself with Lakwena and in turn garner support from her constituents, even going so far as to claim they were cousins.[22] Meanwhile, Kony gained a reputation as having been possessed by spirits. He became a spiritual figure or a medium. Lakwena scored several key victories on the battlefield and began a march towards Kampala.[when?] Kony seized this opportunity to recruit members of the Ugandan People's Democratic Army (UPDA) and Holy Spirit remnants. In 1988, when Lakwena was defeated in Jinja and fled to Kenya, Kony became the leader of the Holy Spirit Mobile Force II some years later.
"Lord’s Resistance Army is just the name of the movement, because we are fighting in the name of God. God is the one helping us in the bush. That’s why we created this name, Lord’s Resistance Army. And people always ask us, are we fighting for the [biblical] Ten Commandments of God. That is true – because the Ten Commandments of God is the constitution that God has given to the people of the world. All people. If you go to the constitution, nobody will accept people who steal, nobody could accept to go and take somebody’s wife, nobody could accept to innocently kill, or whatever. The Ten Commandments carries all this.
i've seen this posted on fb a few times and just haven't had the time to watch it yet. so maybe this question is answered in the video (my apologies if it is).
what happens if/when he IS apprehended? how is the LRA structured? will somebody step up to take his place and just carry on business as usual, or will his apprehension effectively dissolve the LRA (i'm assuming the actual answer is somewhere between those two extremes)?
obviously his apprehension would be for the best regardless. just kind of wondering what will happen after that.
I'm not sure what to think about all of this. I see it popping up everywhere, but as well-intentioned as it is, there are critics out there making some good points.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...kony-campaign/2012/03/07/gIQA7B31wR_blog.html
Hopefully they will look further into the matter rather than just agreeing with the Invisible Children group.
Yeah, this is the key - increased awareness and discussion is always a good thing.
I'm hoping it turns people's eyes toward the problem, but that it doesn't become the most recent "It's cool to be social justice-y" fad.
Unfortunately, our cultural constantly defines itself horizontally in relation to others so it's actually more important to seem good than to actually do good things - and an entire industry has capitalized on this (see: product (red), TOMS, LightGivesHeat, etc.) While they are doing good (some more than others) - it's feeding the narcissism of the West and further removing us from the actual problems because we try material solutions to relational problem.
I can't fault the IV guys because they met people in a circumstance that is not ok and it fueled a passion in them to do something about it through using their gifts. They may not have the broader perspective, but they are pouring out their lives for the benefit of those who have no voice.
Yeah, this is the key - increased awareness and discussion is always a good thing.
I'm hoping it turns people's eyes toward the problem, but that it doesn't become the most recent "It's cool to be social justice-y" fad.
Unfortunately, our cultural constantly defines itself horizontally in relation to others so it's actually more important to seem good than to actually do good things - and an entire industry has capitalized on this (see: product (red), TOMS, LightGivesHeat, etc.) While they are doing good (some more than others) - it's feeding the narcissism of the West and further removing us from the actual problems because we try material solutions to relational problem.
I can't fault the IV guys because they met people in a circumstance that is not ok and it fueled a passion in them to do something about it through using their gifts. They may not have the broader perspective, but they are pouring out their lives for the benefit of those who have no voice.
I have way too much I want to say on this
As someone who lives and works in Africa I understand the sentiment that Kony is a terrible man, and he is.
But I also know that people really need to think about
a) Invisible Children and throroughly investigate all of their clams
b) what happens if Kony was to be taken out? What happens then to both the people and children that Americans want to save
Anyway, I have way too many thought to post here. It is an interesting topic
Yes, but most people don't understand the problems or have any idea how to even begin to solve them. Sure, it would be great for everyone to be educated on the issues and take an active role in helping to solve them, but that is not the reality we live with. People buying a product that raises money to help other people certainly shouldn't be looked at as a bad thing. Obviously, we need to work to create institutional change (that would allow for economic development so people could buy their own shoes) in a lot of developing countries, but criticizing people for buying shoes that provide other people shoes in the short term isn't the answer either. Creating that change takes time and in the meantime it certainly isn't a bad thing that more people have shoes that can make their daily lives a little bit easier.
Yes, but most people don't understand the problems or have any idea how to even begin to solve them. Sure, it would be great for everyone to be educated on the issues and take an active role in helping to solve them, but that is not the reality we live with. People buying a product that raises money to help other people certainly shouldn't be looked at as a bad thing. Obviously, we need to work to create institutional change (that would allow for economic development so people could buy their own shoes) in a lot of developing countries, but criticizing people for buying shoes that provide other people shoes in the short term isn't the answer either. Creating that change takes time and in the meantime it certainly isn't a bad thing that more people have shoes that can make their daily lives a little bit easier.