• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Let's Eliminate Sports Welfare

Arlington proposes giving Rangers $450m for new stadium because the old one isn’t air-conditioned

The city of Arlington has scheduled a press conference for 1:30 pm today to announce plans for a new $900 million stadium for the Texas Rangers, with the cost to be split evenly between the team owners and city taxpayers. The public money would come from extending an existing sales-tax surcharge that’s currently being used to pay off the Dallas Cowboys‘ stadium, and the stadium would reportedly open before the Rangers’ lease on their old stadium expires in 2024.

There had been some talk last fall about the Rangers wanting a new stadium, but still, this is pretty stunning for a couple of reasons. First off, the existing Arlington stadium is only 22 years old, and features almost all the bells and whistles that team owners typically want — yes, it’s “the 11th oldest facility in Major League Baseball” (tied with Cleveland), as WFAA notes, but that’s more a function of the flood of new stadiums that opened in the ’90s and ’00s than a sign of impending decrepitude. The truly amazing thing, though, is that the stated reason for the Rangers wanting a new stadium is that the old one isn’t air-conditioned.
 
How much would it cost to install air conditioning? Or is that not really possible in a stadium like that at this juncture?
 
How much would it cost to install air conditioning? Or is that not really possible in a stadium like that at this juncture?

I think the problem is that it doesn't have a roof. The Nationals wanted $300MM in public funds to build a roof, so around there?
 
So baseball stadiums went from the dome era, to the throwback era, to the retractable roof era?
 
No fan of sports warfare and it's absurd to be replacing the stadium so early, but it is really poorly designed. Went to a September game there a few years ago and it was miserable. Wasn't one of the HOK/Populus designed stadiums of its era, so Arlington doesn't have an enclosed club level with field views. Everyone migrated to the only shady seats in right field since it was literally 100 degrees during the game. Ridiculous that Houston has a retractable roof and Arlington doesn't. Did notice during the same trip that the Highland Park Country Club had multiple big ass misters surrounding every green.
 
So it seems like the problem isn't AC, as much as it is a roof.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
 
If you're an owner who is too dumb to know it gets hot in Texas in the summer time, then you don't deserve air conditioning.
 

I'll tell you why the fuck not: because $450 million over the length of a 20-year bond is roughly $60 per year per Arlington citizen, without factoring interest. All the arguments about economic impact and job creation are so incredibly dumb when you realize you're talking about $60 per person per year and enough money to fund their annual street maintenance budget. Don't give it to one of the several hundred people on this planet who need the money the least.

Holy shit. That ends up over $5000 per family of four. A baby born in Arlington next year would contribute over $1200 to the stadium before being able to legally buy a beer. Of course, in 21 years, they'll probably be gearing up to build another new stadium.

Of course, this is happening in an election year when millionaires and billionaires are donating millions to political campaigns. I think it's a safe bet that the richest people in the Dallas area will be spending $450 million on elections over the next 20 years. They should park that money at the ballpark instead.
 
Last edited:
The cost is now up to $1B, with $500MM coming from the taxpayers.

Unanimous: Arlington City Council signs off on $1 billion Texas Rangers stadium deal

Many wore Rangers jerseys or hats and spoke nostalgically about 44 years’ worth of baseball memories in Arlington. They also praised the council for its financial savvy, and the Rangers for their importance to the local economy.

The council was also prepared to purchase the Rangers’ 49 acres of parking and lease them back to the team. No significant money would change hands, but the deal would allow the Rangers to avoid paying property taxes on those lots.

Financial savvy!

Arlington council unanimously okays Rangers stadium vote, unveils worst. FAQ. Ever.

Under normal circumstances, these kinds of funny numbers would get vetted in a public debate in the media and in public hearings, where critics could introduce other information from more disinterested sources. Instead, any actual discussion will now take place during a six-month referendum campaign, one where the Rangers owners, if they have a brain in their heads, will be pouring millions of dollars into advertising to push their message in hopes of landing more than half a billion dollars in exchange. This is a textbook case of “How to game a stadium vote,” and kudos to Rangers owners Ray Davis and Bob Simpson for pulling it off — though the Arlington council really deserves an assist for making it as easy as possible for them to do so. Next time you’re wondering if the real cause of the sports subsidy scam is greedy owners or craven politicians, the answer is: yes.
 
Ridiculous to have a new stadium after 20 years, no matter what the reason. And the Ballpark is still really frigging nice to boot. They new it was hot in Texas 150 years ago, and they knew it when they built the stadium. It's why smart folks buy seats in the shade and why you have night games.

But in the end, it's up to the taxpayers of Arlington. They may think it's worth it since it's just a little sales tax hike, but all the economic arguments that existed 20 years ago and didn't pan out will not be as effective today.
 
Rio state declares financial emergency, requests funding for Olympics
Rio de Janeiro’s governor declared a state of financial emergency Friday and requested federal funds to help fulfill obligations for public services during the Olympics that start Aug. 5.

Emergency measures are needed to avoid “a total collapse in public security, health, education, transport and environmental management,” a decree in the state’s Official Gazette said.

The state’s revenue, largely tied to the petroleum industry, slumped in the last two years as global oil prices collapsed.

The announcement followed this week’s visit to Rio by Brazil’s Interim President Michel Temer, who said the federal government would ensure all obligations are met for a successful Games.

Rio is expecting about 500,000 foreign visitors during the Olympics, which has coincided with Brazil’s worst recession since the 1930s and a political crisis that last month led to the suspension of President Dilma Rousseff.

“The state’s financial emergency in no way delays the delivery of Olympic projects and the promises assumed by the city of Rio,” Mayor Eduardo Paes said on Twitter.

He also underscored that legacy construction projects, with the exception of an 8.79 billion-real expansion of Rio’s metro that is expected to be finished just days before the Games open, are the responsibility of the city and that most have been completed.

The local organizing committee for the Games said the state’s fiscal situation did not impact its actual running of the Olympics, which relies entirely on private funds.

While the majority of Olympic infrastructure costs have been spread across city, state and federal budgets, with some financing from private companies, the state is responsible for most day-to-day security and health services in Rio.

The financial pinch resulted in a 30-percent cut in the state’s security budget – just as Rio has seen a jump in homicides and assaults in recent months, raising concerns about safety ahead of the Olympics.

The state of Rio expects a budget deficit of over 19 billion reais ($5.56 billion) this year as spending planned before oil prices fell outstrips revenue that is tumbling during Brazil’s recession.

Rio state’s debt has been downgraded several times.

On Wednesday, Fitch Ratings downgraded Rio’s debt rating to ‘B-’ from ‘B+’, saying the state was suffering “a fast-deteriorating liquidity position.”

Since late last year, the state has been forced to delay pension and salary payments and shutter some schools and hospitals, where crucial supplies, including medicines and syringes, are lacking.

Brazil is also facing an outbreak of the Zika virus, which has been linked to the birth defect microcephaly in which babies are born with abnormally small heads frequently associated with developmental issues.
http://www.euronews.com/newswires/3208541-rio-declares-financial-emergency-requests-funding-for-olympics/
 
"Unprecedented" Clause In Rangers Ballpark Deal Will Sneakily Cost Taxpayers A Few More Hundred Million Dollars

Here’s how it works. The agreement, in addition to raising the city’s share of the money by extending a series of tax hikes that are currently paying for the Cowboys’ Stadium, includes an “admissions and parking tax”—a surcharge on tickets and parking. That’s normal, and is a big part of most stadium financing deals.

But in just about every other case, the city (or county/state) uses that tax to pay its share of the stadium’s cost. In this case, the Rangers get to use that tax money to pay down their own stadium debt.
 
How about first we eliminate cock fighting. It's almost as vicious as horse racing.

COCK_FIGHT.JPG
 
Back
Top