No, my post was not false. Polemical, perhaps, but not false:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/j...n-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/
See also
http://nypost.com/2015/04/26/charity-watchdog-clinton-foundation-a-slush-fund/
Please don't confuse complaints about lavish expenses with a misunderstanding of public charities. The point is that outside grants are low. The rest is handled in-house. I generally prefer my henhouse guarded by someone other than the fox.
Also, don't accuse me of supporting Trump.
Your articles are full of shit. The Daily Caller's assertion of 5.7% has been totally debunked as a RW lie.
Here's what Politifact said about an 80/20:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/j...n-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/
RE:In house is because there are no middlemen.
You are simply and totally FOS as usual.