Pilchard
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 3, 2011
- Messages
- 17,192
- Reaction score
- 6,471
Forced to truncate the L'ville report, but don't feel bad about that as everyone knows they are awful.
Here is the quick rundown:
L'ville is 2-13 (0-4) #265. The Cards are on their way to becoming the worst team in ACC History although they have shown some signs of life recently. Their Torvik rating from the start of the season is #323, but since December 15, they are #268, which is bad, but not SC State bad. Last time out, the Cards played their best game of the year in a 70-69 home loss to Cuse.
Analytics (these stats are from ACC games only and the rankings are only involve the 15 ACC teams):
Bad offense (#15 -- DFL in the ACC) 84 offensive efficiency rating:
In ACC games only, L'ville's offense is last in the following metrics:
TO% (26%)
2 PT% (42%)
FT% (62%)
The only two ACC offensive metrics that the Cards aren't awful:
3 PT% 35% (#6)
Offensive rebound% (#8)
Poor defense (#11 in the ACC) 106 defensive efficiency rating (actually L'ville is slightly ahead of WF in defense in ACC games; amongst ACC teams, WF is 14th, ahead of only defenseless ND... yikes).
L'ville' defensive metric ranks among ACC teams:
#6 in defensive TO rate
#7 in 2 PT FG% D (49%)
#7 in steal %
#10 in effective FG%
#13 in 3 PT FG% D (36%)
The Cards are very young #341 in D-1 experience, but they are big #10 in height. Somehow the coaching staff forgot to recruit guards; so, they commit a ton of TOs.
Roster:
In the 70-69 loss to Cuse, L'ville started:
6-3 El Ellis: only guard on the roster; played 40 minutes against Cuse; leads team in scoring, assists and minutes; last two games: 23 against KY and 20 against Cuse
6-5 Mike James: 19 points against Cuse; 37% from 3;
6-8 Karmari Lands: frosh; 23% from 3; first career start againt Cuse; 92% FT
6-8 Sydney Curry: strong; career high 28 at WF last year; 2nd in rebounding; doesn't shoot 3s
6-10 Brandon Huntley-Hatfield: 2nd leading scorer; leading rebounder; blocked shot leader; 93 O rating, which is sadly the best among Card starters
Bench:
6-9 Jae'Lyn Withers; typically starts; 37% from 3; slumping lately
6-8 JJ Traynor: 37% from 3; double figure once this year
Projection: KP projects 76-67 WF; Torvik 78-65. This Saturday, decent chance WF is a double digit road favorite in an ACC game. Can't remember when that last occurred.
The key to beating L'ville is forcing TOs. The Cards' coaching brain-trust decided build a roster with only forwards -- you know because "paint touches" are so important; the result of that policy is the worst TO % among Power V conference teams. WF is merely mediocre at forcing TOs, but Forbes knows L'ville's weakness and will ramp up the pressure. Definitely need to step on L'ville early and break their will. Cuse allowed L'ville to hang around, and Boeheim almost barfed up a win.
Don't have a strong lean in the game. L'ville is playing a little better, and WF is off of Duke-VT-UNC back to back to back; so, this could be a letdown spot. Then again, Forbes' teams usually run it up on bad teams and L'ville is bad. Will probably stay away; may lean under if the total creeps over 140 as L'ville has been slowing the pace lately. WF does have a decisive edge on the bench:
Let's win this one and move on.
Here is the quick rundown:
L'ville is 2-13 (0-4) #265. The Cards are on their way to becoming the worst team in ACC History although they have shown some signs of life recently. Their Torvik rating from the start of the season is #323, but since December 15, they are #268, which is bad, but not SC State bad. Last time out, the Cards played their best game of the year in a 70-69 home loss to Cuse.
Analytics (these stats are from ACC games only and the rankings are only involve the 15 ACC teams):
Bad offense (#15 -- DFL in the ACC) 84 offensive efficiency rating:
In ACC games only, L'ville's offense is last in the following metrics:
TO% (26%)
2 PT% (42%)
FT% (62%)
The only two ACC offensive metrics that the Cards aren't awful:
3 PT% 35% (#6)
Offensive rebound% (#8)
Poor defense (#11 in the ACC) 106 defensive efficiency rating (actually L'ville is slightly ahead of WF in defense in ACC games; amongst ACC teams, WF is 14th, ahead of only defenseless ND... yikes).
L'ville' defensive metric ranks among ACC teams:
#6 in defensive TO rate
#7 in 2 PT FG% D (49%)
#7 in steal %
#10 in effective FG%
#13 in 3 PT FG% D (36%)
The Cards are very young #341 in D-1 experience, but they are big #10 in height. Somehow the coaching staff forgot to recruit guards; so, they commit a ton of TOs.
Roster:
In the 70-69 loss to Cuse, L'ville started:
6-3 El Ellis: only guard on the roster; played 40 minutes against Cuse; leads team in scoring, assists and minutes; last two games: 23 against KY and 20 against Cuse
6-5 Mike James: 19 points against Cuse; 37% from 3;
6-8 Karmari Lands: frosh; 23% from 3; first career start againt Cuse; 92% FT
6-8 Sydney Curry: strong; career high 28 at WF last year; 2nd in rebounding; doesn't shoot 3s
6-10 Brandon Huntley-Hatfield: 2nd leading scorer; leading rebounder; blocked shot leader; 93 O rating, which is sadly the best among Card starters
Bench:
6-9 Jae'Lyn Withers; typically starts; 37% from 3; slumping lately
6-8 JJ Traynor: 37% from 3; double figure once this year
Projection: KP projects 76-67 WF; Torvik 78-65. This Saturday, decent chance WF is a double digit road favorite in an ACC game. Can't remember when that last occurred.
The key to beating L'ville is forcing TOs. The Cards' coaching brain-trust decided build a roster with only forwards -- you know because "paint touches" are so important; the result of that policy is the worst TO % among Power V conference teams. WF is merely mediocre at forcing TOs, but Forbes knows L'ville's weakness and will ramp up the pressure. Definitely need to step on L'ville early and break their will. Cuse allowed L'ville to hang around, and Boeheim almost barfed up a win.
Don't have a strong lean in the game. L'ville is playing a little better, and WF is off of Duke-VT-UNC back to back to back; so, this could be a letdown spot. Then again, Forbes' teams usually run it up on bad teams and L'ville is bad. Will probably stay away; may lean under if the total creeps over 140 as L'ville has been slowing the pace lately. WF does have a decisive edge on the bench:
Let's win this one and move on.