Pilchard
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 3, 2011
- Messages
- 17,192
- Reaction score
- 6,470
Deacs make their 2nd appearance on ESPN in a week, when the Deacs host the Heels on tomorrow (Tuesday) at 7 pm.
Here is the link to the previous report on UNC when WF lost at Chapel Hill 88-79 (UNC's starting lineup remains the same).
In the one month since these teams last played WF is 5-4 (#48 Torvik) UNC is 5-3 (#44 Torvik).
Updated ACC ranks:
Offense
Efficiency: UNC 106.3 (#8) - WF 112 (#2)
TO%: UNC 14.7% - WF 14.4% (#3)
2 PT FG%: UNC 50.7% (#8) - WF 52.2% (#6)
3 PT FG%: UNC 29.6% (#15) - WF 38.3% (#1)
Effective FG%: UNC 48.4% (#14) - WF54.6% (#1)
Defense
Efficiency: UNC 98.7 (#2) - WF 107.5 (#10)
TO%: UNC 15.8 (#9) - 16.8 (#5)
2 PT FG%: UNC 50.3% - WF 52.2% (#12)
3 PT FG%: UNC 32.4 (#4) - WF 36.1% (#12)
Effective FG%: UNC 49.8% (#6) - WF 53% (#10)
Projection: KP 78-77; Torvik 79-77
Deacs catch UNC off back to back losses, including Saturday's over-hyped UNC 63-57 loss to Duke. UNC's offense has struggled over the last two games, particularly from three: 12 for 54 (22%). That said, UNC's best offensive performance in an ACC game this season (yes, a better offensive performance than when UNC played weaklings Notre Dame and L'ville) was its 88 point (1.24 points possession) output against WF. So, facing the soft WF D may help the UNC offense get back on track.
WF was unbeaten at home (10-0) until the last two close losses to UVA and NC State. While UNC needs a win, this is almost an elimination game for WF as the Deacs are already on the wrong side of the bubble (that said, a UNC loss would nudge the Heels to the bubble as well). So, with UNC off the Duke game and given WF greater need for a win, the Deacs have a motivational edge.
The metrics suggest a tight high-scoring contest. Think this game will be played at a slower tempo as both teams have shortened their bench as the season has continued. Would love a blowout, like the Deacs 98-76 beatdown over UNC last year, but think this game will be tight and decided in WF's favor by a missed Caleb Love 3 pointer in the final seconds.
Here is the link to the previous report on UNC when WF lost at Chapel Hill 88-79 (UNC's starting lineup remains the same).
In the one month since these teams last played WF is 5-4 (#48 Torvik) UNC is 5-3 (#44 Torvik).
Updated ACC ranks:
Offense
Efficiency: UNC 106.3 (#8) - WF 112 (#2)
TO%: UNC 14.7% - WF 14.4% (#3)
2 PT FG%: UNC 50.7% (#8) - WF 52.2% (#6)
3 PT FG%: UNC 29.6% (#15) - WF 38.3% (#1)
Effective FG%: UNC 48.4% (#14) - WF54.6% (#1)
Defense
Efficiency: UNC 98.7 (#2) - WF 107.5 (#10)
TO%: UNC 15.8 (#9) - 16.8 (#5)
2 PT FG%: UNC 50.3% - WF 52.2% (#12)
3 PT FG%: UNC 32.4 (#4) - WF 36.1% (#12)
Effective FG%: UNC 49.8% (#6) - WF 53% (#10)
Projection: KP 78-77; Torvik 79-77
Deacs catch UNC off back to back losses, including Saturday's over-hyped UNC 63-57 loss to Duke. UNC's offense has struggled over the last two games, particularly from three: 12 for 54 (22%). That said, UNC's best offensive performance in an ACC game this season (yes, a better offensive performance than when UNC played weaklings Notre Dame and L'ville) was its 88 point (1.24 points possession) output against WF. So, facing the soft WF D may help the UNC offense get back on track.
WF was unbeaten at home (10-0) until the last two close losses to UVA and NC State. While UNC needs a win, this is almost an elimination game for WF as the Deacs are already on the wrong side of the bubble (that said, a UNC loss would nudge the Heels to the bubble as well). So, with UNC off the Duke game and given WF greater need for a win, the Deacs have a motivational edge.
The metrics suggest a tight high-scoring contest. Think this game will be played at a slower tempo as both teams have shortened their bench as the season has continued. Would love a blowout, like the Deacs 98-76 beatdown over UNC last year, but think this game will be tight and decided in WF's favor by a missed Caleb Love 3 pointer in the final seconds.
Last edited: