Maybe some of that, but also Republicans (all Americans, really, but more so Pubs) seem to be very invested in winning. So if it looks like their candidate will win, they are more likely to go out and vote so they can say they voted for the winner.So are we seeing a strategy here of tons of R leaning polls leaking prior to the election to give cover for the voter fraud narrative if/when they lose one?
Was that huge gap between PA gov and senate expected? There's a lot of split ticket voting in GA and PA.
And at least he has a degree in political science from Harvard and was very politically active his entire career.Since the US apparently thinks celebrity makes a person fit to govern, why are all the celebs shitty Pubs? Who was the last celeb Dem that ran for major office? Franken? It isn't like they need to be qualified... being famous is like a 20 point boost.
He's a UGA fan. Too painful to admit.You meant to type Walker right?
That narrative isn't true. Per CNNMSNBC shitting all over Dems for focusing on lost causes like OH and FL and not NC. Maybe if they had sent Obama here and spent a little money Beasley coulda won.
In the third quarter of 2022, Ryan raised a sizable $17.2 million, compared to Vance’s $6.9 million. In the second quarter, the gap was even more dramatic: Ryan raised $9.1 million to Vance’s roughly $1 million.
Still, because of Democratic skepticism about their chances in Ohio, Ryan had to largely go it alone in the state, pouring all the money he raised into a slate of television ads. Vance, by contrast, received considerable outside help – including from the Mitch McConnell-aligned Senate Leadership Fund, which announced in August it planned to spend at least $28 million in the state.