• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Official Russian Election Interference Thread

Russia never stopped its cyberattacks on the United States

By Michael Morell, Mike Rogers
December 25, 2017 at 6:45 PM

Russia never stopped its cyberattacks on the United States


Michael Morell is a former deputy director and twice acting director of the Central Intelligence Agency from 2010 to 2013. Mike Rogers, a Republican from Michigan, served in the House from 2001 to 2015 and was chairman of the Intelligence Committee from 2010 to 2015. Both are on the advisory council for the Alliance for Securing Democracy.

Every first-year international-relations student learns about the importance of deterrence: It prevented a Soviet invasion of Western Europe during the height of the Cold War. It prevented North Korea from invading South Korea in the same time frame. Today, it keeps Iran from starting a hot war in the Middle East or other nations from initiating cyberattacks against our infrastructure.

And yet, the United States has failed to establish deterrence in the aftermath of Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. We know we failed because Russia continues to aggressively employ the most significant aspect of its 2016 tool kit: the use of social media as a platform to disseminate propaganda designed to weaken our nation.

Opinion | The Fox News-Murdoch playbook: Discredit Mueller

Post media critic Erik Wemple says stoking old scandals is an attempt to sow doubt in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into President Trump. (Gillian Brockell/The Washington Post)

There is a perception among the media and general public that Russia ended its social-media operations following last year’s election and that we need worry only about future elections. But that perception is wrong. Russia’s information operations in the United States continued after the election and they continue to this day.

This should alarm everyone — Republicans, Democrats and independents alike. Foreign governments, overtly or covertly, should not be allowed to play with our democracy.

Russia’s information operations tactics since the election are more numerous than can be listed here. But to get a sense of the breadth of Russian activity, consider the messaging spread by Kremlin-oriented accounts on Twitter, which cybersecurity and disinformation experts have tracked as part of the German Marshall Fund’s Alliance for Securing Democracy.

In a single week this month, Moscow used these accounts to discredit the FBI after it was revealed that an agent had been demoted for sending anti-Donald Trump texts; to attack ABC News for an erroneous report involving President Trump and Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser; to critique the Obama administration for allegedly “green lighting” the communication between Flynn and then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak; and to warn about violence by immigrants after a jury acquitted an undocumented Mexican accused of murdering a San Francisco woman.

This continues a pattern of similar activity over the past year. Russian operatives have frequently targeted Republican politicians who have been critical of Trump, including Sen. Jeff Flake (Ariz.), Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.) and Sen. Bob Corker (Tenn.). In September, they also attacked Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) after his decisive “no” vote against the Republican health-care bill.

And in mid-November, after Keurig pulled its advertising from Sean Hannity’s Fox News show for comments the host made defending Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore, the Russians used their social media accounts to urge a boycott of the company. For two days, #boycottkeurig was the most used hashtag among Kremlin-influenced Twitter accounts. This was a Russian attack on a U.S. company and on our economy.

More troublingly, other countries are beginning to follow Russia’s lead on social media, according to research provided by the Alliance for Securing Democracy.The Chinese are doing so in Taiwan, where 75 percent of the population consumes media from a Japanese instant messaging app called LINE — a hotbed for fake news, much of it from China. Some of the messages pushed by Beijing — including one incorrectly saying that the Taiwan government was planning to regulate Buddhist and Taoist temples — have resulted in large protests in Taipei. And Turkey is starting to use social media to try to influence European policy debates, specifically by targeting the large Turkish diaspora in Europe.

While those information operations have not yet reached the United States, they most certainly will. Russia’s use of social media as a political weapon will continue, and more countries will follow suit — until deterrence is established.

The sanctions that the Obama administration and Congress put in place in the aftermath of the 2016 election are steps in the right direction, but they were not significant enough to check Russian President Vladimir Putin. True deterrence requires policies that prevent adversaries from achieving their objectives while imposing significant costs on their regimes. So far, we have done neither.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ac0fd7f097e_story.html?utm_term=.2011e285abd2
 
Last edited:
This section reads like a description of Moonz and Sailor's posting history.

Seriously...go back a few pages and look at the threads Moonz started in the past couple of weeks. It covers most if not all of these things.


"In a single week this month, Moscow used these accounts to discredit the FBI after it was revealed that an agent had been demoted for sending anti-Donald Trump texts; to attack ABC News for an erroneous report involving President Trump and Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser; to critique the Obama administration for allegedly “green lighting” the communication between Flynn and then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak; and to warn about violence by immigrants after a jury acquitted an undocumented Mexican accused of murdering a San Francisco woman."
 
During the election it became very difficult to distinguish between Americans with a terrible grasp of English and native Russian speakers.
 
During the election it became very difficult to distinguish between Americans with a terrible grasp of English and native Russian speakers.

We should be flattered that Russia assigned BSF to us. They knew the OGBoards deserved their best and brightest.
 
Putin wants a nationalist, isolationist, divisive US Government as that limits US influence in key areas throughout the world. When the US advocates and supports an inclusive collaborative "one world view" that threatens Putin's leadership and influence. As a result, the far-Right Bannon/Trump platform perfectly suits Putin, and his operatives were/are better at campaigning/influencing the American electorate in that direction than the Republicans are/were. Discrediting the Mueller investigation is now increasingly in the Republican/far-right interest because regardless of the degree of the collaboration of the Trump campaign and Russian interests, the end result (Trump victory; Republican control of the house and senate) was good.

The end justifies the means.
 
 
Last edited:

Remember when Trump and his supporters were furious over the tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch because of the possibility of Bill influencing the Hillary investigation?

But now Trump has the "absolute right to do what he wants with the DOJ"?

Anyone care to explain or defend?
 
 

And the goalposts continue to move...

Remember when the defense was "we have nothing to do with Russia. Nothing. Never even talked to them."?
 
Back
Top