Official Russian Election Interference Thread
- Thread starter Newenglanddeac
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
A question for the lawyers, if one of the Republicans around Nunes turns and tells Mueller that this was an effort to kill the Russia investigation, could it be considered obstruction of justice?
Or, if Mueller calls Nunes in and gets him to say he was instructed to do this by Trump or the WH, can it be considered obstruction of justice or used to confirm Trump's intent to obstruct justice?
Or, if Mueller calls Nunes in and gets him to say he was instructed to do this by Trump or the WH, can it be considered obstruction of justice or used to confirm Trump's intent to obstruct justice?
THE DEUCE
Well-known member
Nunes = Moron Traitor
Wakeforest22890
Snowpom
O/U on how long it takes Donald to perjure himself under oath? 2.5 minutes?
Wakeforest22890
Snowpom
It would at least be evidence of an intent to obstruct justice.
WakeandBake
Well-known member
opcorn:
Louis Gossett Jr
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
- Messages
- 12,905
- Reaction score
- 6,805
I like how by using memo it’s suppose to attach some additional air of importance to some fan fiction written by a single dumb fuck that graduated from California polytechnic state university, San Luis Obispo.
dartsndeacs
THE quintessential dwarf
should have called it a dossier
WakeandBake
Well-known member
this nunes pup clearly wants to suckle the Trump teat, and he knows the best way to get that sweet milk is to be loyal to the cow no matter how ridiculous or flat wrong he is.
WakeForestRanger
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 22,959
- Reaction score
- 1,169
PhDeac
PM a mod to cement your internet status forever
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 155,839
- Reaction score
- 22,804
Newenglanddeac
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
- Messages
- 13,135
- Reaction score
- 390
Newenglanddeac
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
- Messages
- 13,135
- Reaction score
- 390
Newenglanddeac
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
- Messages
- 13,135
- Reaction score
- 390
"Several independent researchers have said that Facebook has the ability to search for content or metadata that could substantiate or disprove allegations of possible collusion between the Russian disinformation operation and the Trump campaign's own social media efforts, such as timing of certain posts and sharing of content. a. Is this true, and if so, has Facebook found any information relevant to these allegations?" the question reads.
"Facebook does not believe it is in a position to substantiate or disprove allegations of possible collusion," the company responded, according to documents released by the committee on Thursday.
"Facebook is, however, providing investigators, including this Committee, with information it has regarding the scope and nature of Russian information operations on our platform so that those investigators have information that may be relevant to their inquiries," it continued. "We are happy to schedule a meeting with your staff to discuss our findings in more detail."
The comments from Facebook come just months after the company turned over thousands of ads purportedly purchased by Russian agents on the platform during the 2016 election.
"We believe it is vitally important that government authorities have the information they need to deliver to the public a full assessment of what happened in the 2016 election," Facebook's general counsel Colin Stretch said in a post in September.
"That is an assessment that can be made only by investigators with access to classified intelligence and information from all relevant companies and industries - and we want to do our part."