2&2 Slider To Leyritz
Well-known member
No he said don't penalize the parents who want to help their kids just because some parents don't want to help their kids (because our education system should be built around the needs of parents or something)
I then asked him what was to be done about the kids whose parents are shitty. I presumed it was agreed upon that we as a society have a responsibility to take care of those who can't care for themselves (including six year olds with shitty parents).
Apparently not. 2&2 seems to think that its up to the parents and if they don't get the job done then those 6 year olds better make sure they have sturdy bootstraps.
Yeah, okay.
My point is that you don't make the system worse for those who want to choose better for their children simply because some people won't take advantage of it. You don't lock them into shitty schools because some parents don't care if those schools are shitty. You let the ones who want to get out get out, and then you try to make due what you can for those who don't care. Which is exactly what is happening here. This proposal is to take the 5 worst schools in the state and try to fix them. Which should be a pretty clear cut goal. Yet of course, you object, because it isn't some sort Soviet Olympic style program where every kid is taken from their parents at 6 months old to protect them from their parents' own stupidity. So if you want to keep the status quo then go ahead, but then you lose any right to complain when traditional public schools continue to suck.