Well, with respect to the dialog you and I are having, we both agree (with some reservations and caveats) that charter schools and this particular bill can be good things. So I am assuming the first paragraph is not directed at me.
As to the second paragraph, that's just a silly deflection. You are wrong to say that North Carolina educators are doing a "shitty job". The majority of public schools are doing quite well and despite years of funding cuts, North Carolina's schools still perform slightly above the national average in the NAEP tests.
http://www.ncreportcards.org/src/stateDetails.jsp?pLEACode=410&pYear=2012-2013&pDataType=1#stNAEP Over 85% of students graduate from high school on time, with many districts reporting much higher graduation rates.
Guilford County achieved 88.5% last year. As is normal in public education throughout the US, the schools that have the biggest challenges are the schools serving the poorest, most disadvantaged, most segregated areas in the state. I could go on, but the idea that public educators are "doing a shitty job" is nothing more than right-wing propaganda meant to demonize educators and justify spending cuts.
The absurd basketball comparison does not dignify a response. Let's use a better analogy. Educating poor students is a societal necessity and is enshrined in the North Carolina constitution. It's a mandatory and necessary part of state government. If a mandatory and necessary part of a business was struggling - say a company's sales force - would that company slash funding to the sales force and tell them to do more with less? No, the company would devote resources, not only cash but managerial time and expertise, to figuring out the problem and fixing it. That might well include firing poor performers and hiring better ones, but it probably wouldn't include slashing the budget for sales training (see, e.g. killing the Teaching Fellows program and raising tuition at the state schools that train teachers) or telling the sales team they can't have any new marketing collateral or computers until sales improve (see, e.g., defunding textbooks and building maintenance). You could argue "hey maybe the company would outsource its sales force" (e.g. charter schools) - well, maybe so, but no responsible company would actively handicap the operation for five years, then decide to outsource a tiny percentage of the operation while continuing to handicap the rest.