• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Ongoing US GOP Debacle Thread: Seditious Republicans march toward authoritarianism

A couple of Cville updates. One of the 4 RAM (Rise Above Movement) defendants pleaded guilty to 1 count of conspiracy to riot in fed court here yesterday, and they expect another guilty plea this week, which will make 3 of the 4. Not sure what kind of sentence they'll be looking at.

And as expected, our city circuit judge has at long last issued his decision in the Lee and Jackson statues case, and it was what we all expected. This is the suit where a group of concerned citizens sued the city after council voted to move those 2 civil war statues in contravention of a state law that provides localities can't remove war memorials from a list of enumerated wars (VA Code sec. 15.1-1812 if you're interested). The judge found for the plaintiffs saying that it was pretty obvious that the 2 statues in question are indeed war memorials, so the city is prevented from removing them. It is widely believed that our now former city attorney advised our council that they had no legal authority to vote to remove these statues, however 3 of the 5 voted to do so anyway. (This was the issue that got Jason Kessler and his white supremacist buds staging protests at the monuments and showing up at city council sessions to get into screaming matches.) The judge has not yet decided the issue as to whether the individual city councilors can be held liable for money damages for their contravention of the law (which is the issue we're most interested in).


So stupid that the state (undoubtedly Pubs) wants to control what statues a city may re/move.


Let’s see...what do Pubs really stand for? Small government? Nope. Local control? Nope. Fiscal responsibility? Nope.

Gun proliferation? Yep. Obstruction to removing racist monuments? Yep.
 
I don’t think there’s an economics thread. This can go here.


The Sabotage Years: What we now know about G.O.P. economics.


...What all this tells us is that Republican positioning on economic policy has been in bad faith all these years. They didn’t really believe that a debt crisis and hyperinflation were looming. They were just against anything that might help the economy while a Democrat was president.
 
May as well put this here.

The Real Trump Foreign Policy: Stoking the G.O.P. Base


...Plenty of presidents before Mr. Trump have made serious, sometimes catastrophic foreign policy mistakes; but, few, if any, decided almost every aspect of foreign policy on the basis of what would help him get re-elected. Our previous commanders-in-chief conducted policy to advance their vision of the national interest. And until recently, we had two parties in Congress that mostly put country first.

No longer. The Republican Party has largely abdicated its responsibilities in favor of the whims of a president guided solely by personal and political interests, even in executing the most sacred and solemn duty of the office — to keep America safe.
 
And might as well put this one here as well as the GOP continues to morph into the Know Nothing party of the 1850s.

 
And might as well put this one here as well as the GOP continues to morph into the Know Nothing party of the 1850s.


That's because Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, BB&T, Google and facebook aren't hiring history majors- signed a history major
 
So B-Rad, what's your opinion on this? Do you think it is hypocritical for a party to be calling for rate increases right at the beginning of a recovery from a huge economic setback, and then several years later call for rate reductions multiple years into a sustained growth period?

I know actually commenting on things really isn't your forte.
 
Not sure what you are prattling on about, ClintonL68.

The Fed Funds rate was cut to 100bps in late 2008. Who again was calling for rate increases during the recovery other than Trump prior to the 2016 election?

But I'm one who believes the inflation boogeyman has largely been overblown over the last 30 years so have no issue keeping rates low regardless of who is in the white house.
 
Not sure of the best place to put this without starting a new thread, but WTF.

 
So B-Rad, what's your opinion on this? Do you think it is hypocritical for a party to be calling for rate increases right at the beginning of a recovery from a huge economic setback, and then several years later call for rate reductions multiple years into a sustained growth period?

I know actually commenting on things really isn't your forte.


Krugman makes lots of predictions. And when wrong, he seems willing to admit his mistake and try to learn from it.

Seems plenty smart.

Is there some alleged error you (CA) wish to dispute in the above piece?
 
Krugman makes lots of predictions. And when wrong, he seems willing to admit his mistake and try to learn from it.

Link? Surely this wouldn't be difficult to find with the volume of his prediction fails over the years.
 
Well maybe try reading the article you are commenting on?

From the clown who once claimed, and I quote, "By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet's impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine's"?

No thanks... I won't be clicking on that link
 
Back
Top