I think most of us are on the same page.
1. If you're Wake Forest in 2014, you need to hire the coach before he becomes THE coach. I get that. I'm 100% all in on Archie, White, Moton, or that Italian guy. Each of them has a combination of: connection to NC, ability to recruit, ability to connect to players, personality to win over the fanbase, strong ability to coach, experience at a top program, etc. Anyone can make a strong pitch as to why each of those four would experience success here.
2. After realizing Wellman has zero track record of hiring someone in their 30's or someone without private school HC experience or someone without ~6 years of HC experience, you move to the second tier of established, seasoned coaches who may do well. You enter the Lonergan, Amaker, Howland, Paulsen, Mooney, Reed tier of coaches. I guess you throw in Turner here, too, because of his ties to Wake. Where do you go here? I would argue Howland has a better track record than any of the other coaches in this tier, but I guess I can be convinced of Amaker or Lonergan (though he's not leaving DC).
If you want to stay in (1) and keep arguing the up-and-coming coach over the guys in (2), that's fine, but you're going to be disappointed if Ron doesn't dramatically change his hiring approach.