You know as much as I do, shithead, unless you were there or are otherwise part of the investigation. I was speculating on the legalities of the issue in the earlier post. I don't know the extent of the involvement for all these kids in the fraternity (minus the one in the report) any more than you do, but somebody who doesn't witness the event and merely hears about it from brothers who are likely downplaying it is going to share a lesser degree of responsibility, both legally and civilly. I don't see why that conclusion is inflammatory. Pull the stick out of your ass.
Typical chime-in from Ph. Let somebody else attack first and then offer your brilliant passive-aggressive insight. I clicked on the link yesterday and watched the report, which regrettably autoplayed. I read some of the article too but obviously didn't gather the timeline within it because I don't remember reading any of those details.