Wakeforest22890
Snowpom
If getting rid of [Redacted] within the next two years meant that Wake would incur relatively substantial NCAA violations would you want it to happen? This is inspired by the other thread about [Redacted]/Wellman that Stratt started.
For the purposes of this we'll say that players were being paid by boosters and [Redacted] was committing recruiting violations. The penalty would be a one year post season ban, two scholarships removed for the next three years, and five years probation. The school would also be dragged through the mud in local and national media for committing these violations. What level of violations would you accept in order to fire [Redacted]? More severe, less severe, any?
Poll forthcoming.
For the purposes of this we'll say that players were being paid by boosters and [Redacted] was committing recruiting violations. The penalty would be a one year post season ban, two scholarships removed for the next three years, and five years probation. The school would also be dragged through the mud in local and national media for committing these violations. What level of violations would you accept in order to fire [Redacted]? More severe, less severe, any?
Poll forthcoming.
Last edited: