WakeForestRanger
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 22,959
- Reaction score
- 1,169
The low amount of past voter fraud is a pretty poor argument IMO. You don't setup controls to prevent fraud only after someone has stolen from you.
of course not. Just make property taxes due in November and have the ballot on the same form you submit with your tax remittance.sure but would you create an arduous, byzentine system that inconveniences everyone to solve a problem that's never been a problem, though?
Do you know many college kids (or these days, people in their 20s/30s in metro areas) that are paying property taxes?of course not. Just make property taxes due in November and have the ballot on the same form you submit with your tax remittance.
Not sure non property owners should be voting AMIRITEDo you know many college kids (or these days, people in their 20s/30s in metro areas) that are paying property taxes?
Maybe…and hear me out…we already had sufficient controls to prevent voter fraud and that’s why it isn’t and hasn’t been happening.The low amount of past voter fraud is a pretty poor argument IMO. You don't setup controls to prevent fraud only after someone has stolen from you.
Maybe…and hear me out…we already had sufficient controls to prevent voter fraud and that’s why it isn’t and hasn’t been happening.
Obviously, the only remedy is voting out the people who insured that your vote never has enough power to vote them out.JFC this is bad.