how the fuck do you know this? the book is based off an interview on tape. stop claiming falsehood when you don't know shit about what was discussed. remember, this guys was part of "maybe the single greatest reporting effort of all time". fuckards always claiming BS when they don't like what is being reported...it is so Trump, snowflake and tired. and we know when Trump calls something fake you know it is real...proven time and time again.
if what he reported is false (remember it is on tape), prove it don't be a prick and claim something you don't know.
C'mon, read the reviews. The book "draws" from interviews by many individuals. It is not a total regurgitation of interviews, thus somewhat subjective. Which is all I said.
It might be best to read the damn thing before you give the guy a Pulitzer Prize.
And that's "Mr. Prick" to you.