WindyCityDeac
Well-known member
With the Commanders on the brink of being sold, I've seen a lot about Daniel Snyder being "worst owner in sports" etc. My question though is objectively is he and why ?
He clearly is making money off the sale, so the ownership was objectively successful.
Is the role of ownership to win ? Is it to increase profitability for shareholders/family ? Engender good will in the community ? Is it a sacred trust with the community ?
Ideally all of the above...but what is the primary charter ?
I don't have an answer but thought it would be an interesting discussion among the giant brains here on the board.
He clearly is making money off the sale, so the ownership was objectively successful.
Is the role of ownership to win ? Is it to increase profitability for shareholders/family ? Engender good will in the community ? Is it a sacred trust with the community ?
Ideally all of the above...but what is the primary charter ?
I don't have an answer but thought it would be an interesting discussion among the giant brains here on the board.